Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've been reading up on Kamala Harris.... [View all]Bettie
(19,712 posts)9. She was a prosecutor
so she will have had some harder views on some things than someone who wasn't part of that system or who came up from a different area of it.
No matter what, she's been a good senator and she can hold her own in a debate. Plus, she is FAR better than any Republican, so if she's the nominee, I'll enthusiastically support her.
Really, how many candidates are we going to agree with in every way?
There are few (probably no) humans who I agree with on everything.
SO, choose your primary candidate based on whatever you think is most important, but VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT IN THE GENERAL!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh, come on! It's fair to do some research because we have so many people running or about
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#24
well, obviously if we run primaries we have to weigh what it is we like about our candidates and
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#47
Gee wiz, why would someone discuss a political topic on a political discussion forum.
progressoid
Jan 2019
#115
Well, I didn't. The moment she won in the primaries and became our candidate I was in full support
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#32
I have one very practical reason for reading up on her: we can be prepared for what the Trump
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#41
It would be convenient if the Perpetually Pouting Purity Brigade could absolve themselves
Maru Kitteh
Jan 2019
#69
They had very clever, tempered ways of attacking her to make it seem like not outright
Eliot Rosewater
Jan 2019
#102
If we don't confront things like this now, the Republicans and the Russians will reminds us later
DFW
Jan 2019
#97
If we judged all of our candidates on one thing we didn't agree with in his/her career....
George II
Jan 2019
#72
thanks demmi. We dems can't bury our heads in the sand. I know we're all upset with Trump
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#65
This tweet by Lawrence O'Donnell from this a.m. is food for thought (for any candidate):
demmiblue
Jan 2019
#76
because of the way your worded your post. You should delete this whole thread.
trueblue2007
Jan 2019
#63
I think we should all wait until we see who is going to wind up deciding to be a candidate....
George II
Jan 2019
#74
Yikes! How about supporting one's preferred candidate, or explaining why they are the better choice?
Freethinker65
Jan 2019
#81
DU was enormously pissed off at Gillibrand after the Franken thing and perhaps rightly so.
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#87
The same people saying "Don't bash Harris or Dems" are the loudest against Gabbard.
Decoy of Fenris
Jan 2019
#92
How is what I posted a "smear"? I thought we were now evaluating the relative merits of our
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#106
I never thought I would have to justify my research into the Dem.candidates before the primaries
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#105
Sorry, it wasn't what I meant to post anyway...it was a NYT article, but that is probably
CTyankee
Jan 2019
#110
I would read some of the comments on the NYT article, specifically the ones posted by other lawyers
octoberlib
Jan 2019
#117
There's no one as pure as Obama is, the rest are all going to hell!!! /sarcasm
uponit7771
Jan 2019
#114