Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: My top 4: Harris, Gillibrand, Gabbard, Warren [View all]madville
(7,858 posts)47. This is going to be a mess but entertaining
with such a large field. We potentially could see a few front runners winning states with 20% of the vote. That's one reason I'm behind Biden jumping in, he can easily win with 30% in every state and potentially sweep the first primaries.
I worry about the convention though, the person with the most delegates won't automatically be the nominee if two or three other candidates combine their forces with some kind of deal. That's what I think could be the real mess.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gabbard is not a major political candidate but I'm glad you like her. Better write her name in
UniteFightBack
Jan 2019
#6
Since you asked, and in no particular order, Harris, Biden, Castro, Booker..... Oh wait, I like all
still_one
Jan 2019
#8
All of them have "problems" that will be exploited during the primaries...
TreasonousBastard
Jan 2019
#12
Gillibrand? No Way! She'll never get it. The Franken problem kills it for her. Gabbard? Nope.
LBM20
Jan 2019
#49
Harris and Warren had the same position with respect to Franken as Gillibrand
oberliner
Jan 2019
#52