Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

JaneQPublic

(7,117 posts)

23. On that we agree! (nt)

Reply to still_one (Reply #21)

Wed Jan 30, 2019, 11:06 AM

Jan 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Perfect name for Schultz, Bloomberg, Trump, Steyer... [View all] JaneQPublic Jan 2019 OP

working link here.... CurtEastPoint Jan 2019 #1

Thanks! JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #2

I think it was the final " CurtEastPoint Jan 2019 #9

I see. Much appreciated! JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #22

At least Steyer said he won't be running in 2020...so that's one down. nt PunkinPi Jan 2019 #3

Hope he sticks with it. (nt) JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #5

At least Bloomberg is doing the honorable thing by running as a Democrat. octoberlib Jan 2019 #4

I agree. JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #7

HA HA HA THAT is a good one. pangaia Jan 2019 #20

+1 Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2019 #27

Exactly. Putting Bloomberg in that group is not fair because of those very important still_one Jan 2019 #8

I'm not a fan, especially after his recent comments. JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #13

It isn't a question about being for or against him, it is the fact that he recognizes that to run as still_one Jan 2019 #14

Schultz is little more than Donald Trump in disguise. Lonestarblue Jan 2019 #24

+1 Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2019 #29

I've got a strong case of "Billionairephobia". Eyeball_Kid Jan 2019 #32

Bloomberg and Steyer are OK Loki Liesmith Jan 2019 #6

Similar feeling about Steyer, but he owns his opinions/policies bigbrother05 Jan 2019 #16

Except Trump's not a billionaire EffieBlack Jan 2019 #10

Exactly - 12 years as mayor of NYC is very significant. Lucky Luciano Jan 2019 #25

I'm not a big fan of Bloomberg, but he IS a serious politician and government exec EffieBlack Jan 2019 #30

Two reasons for a loud "NO". n/t Eyeball_Kid Jan 2019 #33

Wow. Look at all these Dems here jumping to defend the One Percent! (nt) JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #11

There are plenty of reasons to be against Schultz or Bloomberg. Because they are the 1% still_one Jan 2019 #17

So you think it would be fine for Dems to nominate a billionaire in 2020? JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #18

First of all if Bloomberg runs, he isn't going to win the Democratic nomination. Do I think it is still_one Jan 2019 #21

On that we agree! (nt) JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #23

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one Jan 2019 #26

I believe the term is Plutocrats mitch96 Jan 2019 #12

+1. I'm trying to keep an open mind, but I think Ted Lieu has it right ... we already tried that KPN Jan 2019 #15

Billionaire white boyz club pangaia Jan 2019 #19

I don't necessarily disagree MontanaMama Jan 2019 #28

I greatly admire Oprah, but I don't want her for POTUS. JaneQPublic Jan 2019 #31

Agree 100% MontanaMama Jan 2019 #35

No more non-lawyers or business men in the White House, whether they're billionaires or not. ancianita Jan 2019 #34