Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

diva77

(7,880 posts)
15. This is what they'd like you to believe; however, inevitably, deserving voters will be knocked off
Thu Feb 7, 2019, 10:15 PM
Feb 2019

the rolls and deprived of the right to vote (Dems being the target of the purges)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When I moved, my old CA county told me just not to vote More_Cowbell Feb 2019 #1
almost seems like a way for elections officials to set up people to look like they're committing diva77 Feb 2019 #2
Does this make sense? "two general elections, or two to four years" DURHAM D Feb 2019 #3
Agreed. The 2-4 yrs. seems severe. And of course, based on typical elections official/rethug diva77 Feb 2019 #6
Can't say about this case. Igel Feb 2019 #12
How can there be harm when those voters became inactive eleny Feb 2019 #4
see post #6 diva77 Feb 2019 #7
Who determines who gets the notices? eleny Feb 2019 #8
not sure (if I find out will follow up). Here's example of recent "accidental" registration problems diva77 Feb 2019 #10
Why is it so hard to determine if those inactive voters still reside in the State? Why risk purging wiggs Feb 2019 #5
What should they do? former9thward Feb 2019 #9
I remember going to my polling place where there was another precinct in there too nini Feb 2019 #11
This is what they'd like you to believe; however, inevitably, deserving voters will be knocked off diva77 Feb 2019 #15
Honestly.. this is a mixed bag nini Feb 2019 #26
I left LA in fall 1999. Igel Feb 2019 #13
interesting angle regarding the voter-turnout numbers; I wonder whether the pollsters take any of diva77 Feb 2019 #32
It would be so much easier to transfer their registration to another jurisdiction LiberalFighter Feb 2019 #14
All of my friends from "way down yonder" voted. akraven Feb 2019 #16
Judicial Watch is a right wing organization -- so I'm not sure I'm understanding what diva77 Feb 2019 #17
They follow law, not people. SPLC does, too (more "left"). akraven Feb 2019 #18
Interesting. I guess the problems arise when trying to carry out constitutional duties -- diva77 Feb 2019 #19
It's helpful to have attorney and paralegals as friends. akraven Feb 2019 #22
Judicial Watch needs to "move" to the sewer from where they sprang. oasis Feb 2019 #20
Do you have more info. on who's behind that organization? My understanding is that it is a wingnut diva77 Feb 2019 #21
It is. But mostly more watchdog than wingnut. nt akraven Feb 2019 #23
Here: dalton99a Feb 2019 #24
Thank you! Will read this for sure! diva77 Feb 2019 #27
Larry Klayman built JW by going after the Clintons for decades. nt oasis Feb 2019 #25
Thanks for info. diva77 Feb 2019 #28
Californian here. Dem2theMax Feb 2019 #29
sounds like the rr/cc got it right in this case diva77 Feb 2019 #30
I know. Dem2theMax Feb 2019 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LA County and State to Pu...»Reply #15