Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Velveteen Ocelot

(130,645 posts)
32. This isn't just GOP ratf*cking, though they'd use it if they could, just as the MN GOP did in 2006.
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:23 PM
Feb 2019

Unfortunately, these claims have been made ever since 2006, when she was the Hennepin County Attorney and first ran for the Senate. At that time the local GOP made a big deal of some staff complaints and tried to get the union, AFSCME, to withhold their endorsement, but they endorsed her anyhow and she went on to win. However, there seems to be at least some basis for these complaints, and whether it's coming from just a few disgruntled employees or maybe people over-reacting to a demanding boss (maybe because of her gender?), it seems to me that it's something that needs to be addressed head-on, and explained and dealt with early, so it can't be made a big deal when the primaries start up.

All of the candidates are going to have flaws, and maybe a few skeletons in their closets, even if just a femur or a thumb bone. Some of these might be problematic; some not; some maybe not even real. But it's better to know about them before voters have to make decisions. Give the candidates a chance to address the claims and be done with them if possible, and move on. We don't want a situation like Virginia or John Edwards.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If they are clutching their pearls riverwalker Feb 2019 #1
oh maaan i hate hearing that about her... samnsara Feb 2019 #2
Same here. She is one of my faves as a VP pick for Biden (if he gets in) elfin Feb 2019 #11
Lies, unproven. See 14, below question everything Feb 2019 #15
Interesting. It is said that one can discern the character of PatrickforO Feb 2019 #3
Great suggestion exboyfil Feb 2019 #8
Amazing people will take this story at face value BannonsLiver Feb 2019 #19
Yeah, this sounds like ratfucking to me. brush Feb 2019 #33
Well, Booker's opponents (and right wing people pretending to be PatrickforO Feb 2019 #38
Yeah, they haven't turned their full fire on him yet. brush Feb 2019 #41
I have not taken this story at face value. PatrickforO Feb 2019 #40
Anonymous sources? Were their names like "Doger Stone" and "Derome Corsi"? manor321 Feb 2019 #4
Before you discount the source... brooklynite Feb 2019 #16
I understand but male candidates are never discussed this way manor321 Feb 2019 #25
I've certainly heard Rachel Sgent Feb 2019 #49
most likely not crazycatlady Feb 2019 #36
I am stunned. irresistable Feb 2019 #5
Was posted in MN thread....... a kennedy Feb 2019 #6
So the smears and whispers are starting with Amy now The empressof all Feb 2019 #7
HuffPo has been reliably anti Dem for a while now BannonsLiver Feb 2019 #21
Lots of details in there BeyondGeography Feb 2019 #9
Here we go PatSeg Feb 2019 #10
+1 Power 2 the People Feb 2019 #52
If any campaign picks up any of these "unhappy few". Red flag. oasis Feb 2019 #12
I knew this was coming. Kingofalldems Feb 2019 #13
Post removed Post removed Feb 2019 #34
PLEASE do not repeat this piece of fake journalism question everything Feb 2019 #14
Good catch. Kingofalldems Feb 2019 #17
Not what the article says... brooklynite Feb 2019 #22
Glad to see that they added the qualification. I complained question everything Feb 2019 #28
It doesn't matter when she joined the Senate. It's talking about rate of turnover. Garrett78 Feb 2019 #37
So three people didn't bail on the top campaign job? BeyondGeography Feb 2019 #27
I don't know but I am sure they have their own reasons question everything Feb 2019 #30
It doesn't say her tenure started in 2001 Autumn Feb 2019 #35
Acknowledged. PatrickforO Feb 2019 #44
Amy Klobuchar acknowledges that the story is true... brooklynite Feb 2019 #57
"My boss didn't like my work" Renew Deal Feb 2019 #18
The Trolls are Busy dlk Feb 2019 #20
Meh ibegurpard Feb 2019 #23
I've read, here and there, that Bernie Sanders rusty fender Feb 2019 #24
Look at all the repsonses already in this thread immediately falling for this tactic of DontBooVote Feb 2019 #26
You are too smart to be this gullible eom emulatorloo Feb 2019 #29
Who is that person supporting for 2020 ? OnDoutside Feb 2019 #43
Apparently, Sen Klobuchar is unacceptable because she is from Minnesota. LakeSuperiorView Feb 2019 #31
This isn't just GOP ratf*cking, though they'd use it if they could, just as the MN GOP did in 2006. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2019 #32
as someone who's worked for both male and female candidates crazycatlady Feb 2019 #46
Compared to Trump: Kingofalldems Feb 2019 #39
This unsourced bullshit was posted here 2 days ago jcgoldie Feb 2019 #42
I don't know... this has kind of an "Arkansas Project" scent to it. Just a feeling. Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2019 #45
Agreed n/t emulatorloo Feb 2019 #47
UPDATE: Buzzfeed has it's own reporting brooklynite Feb 2019 #48
That article's even worse! My god. octoberlib Feb 2019 #50
High staff turnover is always a tell octoberlib Feb 2019 #51
Wow. Not good. smirkymonkey Feb 2019 #53
Yep. If true doesn't sound like someone I would want to vote for. LisaL Feb 2019 #54
I was shocked. A lot of people are crying sexism, that women get judged differently but octoberlib Feb 2019 #55
Not great to read about Awsi Dooger Feb 2019 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sen. Amy Klobuchar's Mist...»Reply #32