Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(8,231 posts)

16. There is a BIG difference between: "there is no direct evidence" and "there is no evidence" nt

Tue Feb 12, 2019, 01:00 PM

Feb 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senate investigation: No direct evidence of conspiracy. They remind me of the OJ trial. [View all] shockey80 Feb 2019 OP

Nunes revisited. spanone Feb 2019 #1

I mean...he did...on camera...at a press conference... TCJ70 Feb 2019 #6

Agreed, he hinted very strongly. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #15

NOT THE SENATE...... REPUBLICANS..... in the senate.. pangaia Feb 2019 #3

No one framed OJ. shockey80 Feb 2019 #7

Are you talking about what Burr said in an interview last week? blogslut Feb 2019 #9

Has Burr even been briefed on the investigating by Mueller? Nevilledog Feb 2019 #13

I don't know blogslut Feb 2019 #14

Here's the way I see it. Nevilledog Feb 2019 #17

This is just more bullshit from NBC's Ken Delanian manor321 Feb 2019 #10

So hard to nail white collar criminals Miigwech Feb 2019 #11

We need the results to be the truth, no matter what it is. Hortensis Feb 2019 #12