Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NY Dem Congresswoman Goes Off on Opposition to Amazon HQ2: 'Now We're Protesting Jobs?' [View all]Hoyt
(54,770 posts)24. Except, it's not like there was $3 Billion in bank. NYC was forging $3 B
in future IF Amazon met certain goals. Those employees would have paid a lot in taxes to fund other things.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NY Dem Congresswoman Goes Off on Opposition to Amazon HQ2: 'Now We're Protesting Jobs?' [View all]
DonViejo
Feb 2019
OP
Maloney is wrong. We don't need this massive corporate welfare for the superrich
manor321
Feb 2019
#1
Governor Cuomo said the state would get back $9 in taxes for every $1 in incentives.
former9thward
Feb 2019
#84
Good point. "I'm a progressive too, but I'm pragmatic," Maloney (Democrat in District) responded.
Hoyt
Feb 2019
#3
Not progressive enough to refuse to market and distribute books through Amazon...
lapucelle
Feb 2019
#27
Bernie said said the feds should cut off highway funds to states that undercut each other.
mjvpi
Feb 2019
#55
Yes and same with Seattle and Amazon. You described the situation accurately.
suffragette
Feb 2019
#25
WA is a divided purple state, mostly Republican east of the Cascades. Seattle is solidly blue and so
suffragette
Feb 2019
#62
Gates Sr. was the one who pushed for an income tax in WA last go around
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Feb 2019
#92
Addressing the poster's point about progressiveness and income tax in WA and pointing out some
suffragette
Feb 2019
#94
Well, she makes it sound in the OP like she has a constituency in need of jobs.
Cuthbert Allgood
Feb 2019
#37
The assumption seemed to be that people in her district would not be qualified enough for the jobs.
lapucelle
Feb 2019
#49
That's not alternate proposal through which "locals" will bring in 25,000 jobs. N/T
lapucelle
Feb 2019
#91
Amazon says they would bring in 25,000 jobs by end of June 2028. At what would amount to a cost
Nanjeanne
Feb 2019
#30
I'm sure that part of it is that they feel that they can attract the talent
TexasBushwhacker
Feb 2019
#68
Have you listened to any of the people who live in Seattle talking about their home before and
Squinch
Feb 2019
#64
Yup. And interesting article about how Amazon stopped the proposed "head tax" proposed
Nanjeanne
Feb 2019
#71
Another point of view? I think Teachout is right and supports what was in the article
Nanjeanne
Feb 2019
#75
It's horrible...it makes Republicans look like the party for jobs and Dems the party of job killers
BluegrassDem
Feb 2019
#86
No one wanting those opportunities is going to give a crap about "sending messages",
AncientGeezer
Feb 2019
#89