Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Stone desperately claims 'crosshairs' photo of judge is not threatening: [View all]Stuart G
(38,726 posts)53. i guess that Roger is in the same bin as Donald the 5 watt bulb.
Pretty dim. Now...since posting something like that against a sitting "judge" is against the law, can experts trace how it was posted and who posted it?..Which computer posted it?..I suspect that law enforcement can do that because this kind of thing has been traced in the past, and will be traced again and in the future. If it is traced to a computer owned by Dim Bulb Roger, then what do you know, to jail Roger will go.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Stone desperately claims 'crosshairs' photo of judge is not threatening: [View all]
Gothmog
Feb 2019
OP
Did he re-post it without the crosshair? If so, that looks like consciousness of guilt.
alwaysinasnit
Feb 2019
#4
This may make it easier for his attorney(s) to withdraw from his case (if they have any integrity).
alwaysinasnit
Feb 2019
#9
Good possibility, but I think the risks of this type of move outweigh the benefits IMO. It never
alwaysinasnit
Feb 2019
#31
I don't think that will be successful because any animus, if any, will have occurred after
alwaysinasnit
Feb 2019
#35
I don't know but if they are, then they have good reason to be unhappy. Although, I can't spare them
alwaysinasnit
Feb 2019
#68
Shouldn't the judge be the one to determine if the photo is "threatening" since it targets her? nt
allgood33
Feb 2019
#82
I care more about her safety than whether he spends a little more time in jail.
mucifer
Feb 2019
#79
It's like the Mafia saying that the dead fish they left on your doorstep was a gift
dalton99a
Feb 2019
#13
Chutzpah: Killing your parents and then pleading for mercy because you are an orphan.
eggplant
Feb 2019
#60
Stone attorneys scramble to file court documents apologizing to judge for crosshairs photo
Gothmog
Feb 2019
#62
Next time we see the Rog, he'll probably be pulling up to Judge Jackson in a snazzy wheelchair
Mr. Ected
Feb 2019
#47
My bet is he did it on purpose with the goal of getting a new judge that might show
cstanleytech
Feb 2019
#48
I never said it would work just that my bet is that is what his goal and if
cstanleytech
Feb 2019
#58
Problem is Gorsuch and Kavanaugh as I am willing to bet Trump will call in some markers if it gets
cstanleytech
Feb 2019
#70
"When I say 'He should be bludgeoned over the head with a thick piece
struggle4progress
Feb 2019
#77