somewhere. And, as typical, Republicans spend more money and create
deficits, and then call us big spenders (Rovian tactic - blame your opponent
first for what you, yourself do). Think I would say less bombs/fighter jets to pay for it 
Maybe because I've worked in business, but without a payback period, a rollout
plan, a study of others who have implemented the same thing, constraints,
issues, etc. NOTHING gets off the ground.
If it was in business, for example, the goal would be to achieve full
state college free tuition for all who want to go within 10 years. And the implementation might start with a pilot - perhaps a few states, or a few colleges or something like that. And study how it went after a certain period, then roll out X # year two, etc. etc.
This is cautious, but it makes the board more comfortable. Same as it would make voters more comfortable. That the cost will be spread out. That you are achieving something and know how to manage. You could even make it fun and have a lottery of some kind. And the winner is...the University of Hawaii !!
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read