Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

marlakay

(13,280 posts)

35. Totally agree I think the trolls

Reply to watoos (Reply #29)

Sat Feb 23, 2019, 04:43 PM

Feb 2019

Are already trying to cause infighting with dems on social media and elsewhere.

Even if we have a candidate we prefer we should think twice about saying anything super negative about the others as it will easily get picked up and used against us.

Its getting hard where to go for news these days because all of them seem to have a slant against something.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You have to wonder about the agenda of HuffPost.... [View all] apcalc Feb 2019 OP

RW money. It is always about the money. democratisphere Feb 2019 #1

I watched an interview yesterday, watoos Feb 2019 #9

Yes, I saw that! "Millionaire paid by billionaires"...really got Tucker going... apcalc Feb 2019 #11

The Oligarchs of the entire world have successfully overthrown the masses. democratisphere Feb 2019 #12

I dropped them when the drug ads and articles about entertainers began to outnumber the news pecosbob Feb 2019 #2

Excellent Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #8

I was just noting how twitter is awash with nasty Klobuchar tweets. Sickening to say riversedge Feb 2019 #3

It's a hit job riverwalker Feb 2019 #6

They are pushing this stuff hard riverwalker Feb 2019 #4

I stopped following it as soon as "Huffington Post" became "HuffPost." Miles Archer Feb 2019 #5

Miles, question True Blue American Feb 2019 #17

I don't visit Slate that often... Miles Archer Feb 2019 #22

The only reason I do is because the ryicles come up. True Blue American Feb 2019 #23

Not really Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #7

It is much more sinister than that, watoos Feb 2019 #14

In the end however Sherman A1 Feb 2019 #25

Like all the rest, they are hit-n-miss. They do have the occasional piece or article that is spot ForgedCrank Feb 2019 #10

Their primary goal is not to make money. watoos Feb 2019 #15

Amy is not True Blue American Feb 2019 #19

Yes they did fire Donahue watoos Feb 2019 #28

I do wish some wealthy billionaire True Blue American Feb 2019 #30

I'm not privileged to any inside information, so if you view them as anything other ForgedCrank Feb 2019 #20

Thank you all.... I realize from reading your comments that they are pretty much junk.... apcalc Feb 2019 #13

NY Times also did a story on Klobuchar yesterday mtngirl47 Feb 2019 #16

I'm dropping them. No longer timely or pertinent. Filled with clickbait ads and shill pieces. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2019 #18

Ariana Huffington UpInArms Feb 2019 #21

And one of True Blue American Feb 2019 #24

Question: what negative stories are you willing to read about a candidate, and by whom? brooklynite Feb 2019 #26

The gripe is because the media is not True Blue American Feb 2019 #31

I dispute that the Coast Guard plot is not being covered... brooklynite Feb 2019 #32

It was obscure to me True Blue American Feb 2019 #33

It IS more important; that doesn't mean a false hate crime accusation isn't also brooklynite Feb 2019 #34

we have HAVE to protect our own party from all outside influencers.. samnsara Feb 2019 #27

One cure is to not be negative. watoos Feb 2019 #29

Totally agree I think the trolls marlakay Feb 2019 #35

The boards are being flooded True Blue American Feb 2019 #36