Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bearsfootball516

(6,713 posts)
32. I'm not really sure where I fall on this.
Tue Feb 26, 2019, 02:11 PM
Feb 2019

I don't believe in harassing people, of course. But at the same time, I don't see why there's anything wrong with asking for evidence to back up a statement. I always check to see if what I'm posting is accurate before I hit send.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There is no shortage of sea lions right here at DU. comradebillyboy Feb 2019 #1
Can you prove that? Do you have any stats to back that up? Oh, your post aggrieves me! *faints* Bucky Feb 2019 #18
I've been watching Trump so maybe I can make up some compelling stats comradebillyboy Feb 2019 #29
I wonder if DownriverDem Feb 2019 #43
At a minimum 86.324% do support Democrats comradebillyboy Feb 2019 #47
Journal of Irreproducible Results wryter2000 Feb 2019 #50
But do 99.713% of the best people agree with you 100%??? dameatball Feb 2019 #68
Sometimes they do comradebillyboy Feb 2019 #70
Can't argue with that! dameatball Feb 2019 #74
YES! lillypaddle Feb 2019 #66
And this "SeaLioning" is a bad thing? LiberalLovinLug Feb 2019 #73
Asking for facts to support a position one has taken is fine. comradebillyboy Feb 2019 #78
I would agree with being deliberately obtuse LiberalLovinLug Feb 2019 #83
And here I thought that was called Dinesh D'Souzaing. NT mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2019 #2
It's older than D'Ishonest D'zaster JHB Feb 2019 #9
D'Ishonest D'zaster Bucky Feb 2019 #20
@KevinMKruse, on twitter, is a brilliant historian and has a sub specialty on 'dunkin' on Dinesh' irisblue Feb 2019 #10
a thread of all the *other* historians who've debunked @DineshDSouza on Twitter. mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2019 #21
Yeah I bookmarked that. irisblue Feb 2019 #22
*snort* smirkymonkey Feb 2019 #56
Got any evidence, please? snort Feb 2019 #3
I posted 2 websites. irisblue Feb 2019 #5
I have most of the sealions on ignore. demmiblue Feb 2019 #4
I'd come across the term on DU a few years back LanternWaste Feb 2019 #6
Beat me to it. JHB Feb 2019 #8
Thanks for the cartoon irisblue Feb 2019 #13
well... qazplm135 Feb 2019 #44
I know that user very well. One of at least three who used to continually follow me around DU... NurseJackie Feb 2019 #51
.... George II Feb 2019 #85
A lot of that goes on. It's so easy to spot people who do that and I've decided I don't need to play Autumn Feb 2019 #7
Just curious: Why are they called sealions? nt tblue37 Feb 2019 #11
Chech out post#6 irisblue Feb 2019 #15
Yes, I saw that. But I still don't understand what it is about the animal sea lion that tblue37 Feb 2019 #17
Because they pop up suddenly, bark and bellow, and then submerge again . . hatrack Feb 2019 #26
Ah--now I understand. Thanks. nt tblue37 Feb 2019 #31
As A Toddler RobinA Feb 2019 #33
Also, they never STFU. maxsolomon Feb 2019 #55
Also, they park themselves right in the way and won't budge Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2019 #63
Large, aggressive and smelling of fish? The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2019 #57
This is a good OP to bookmark for future reference. lpbk2713 Feb 2019 #12
:blush: irisblue Feb 2019 #35
Tons of that here melman Feb 2019 #14
That's not why the sealioning is in their signature line ismnotwasm Feb 2019 #23
Your opinion melman Feb 2019 #24
I know who you are talking about ismnotwasm Feb 2019 #27
Look melman Feb 2019 #28
That's not my style ismnotwasm Feb 2019 #30
This is a complete misrepresentation on your part. R B Garr Feb 2019 #77
Haha.. No, it's Not "the end" just Cha Feb 2019 #86
It's not an opinion. George II Feb 2019 #92
I hadn't seen that. demmiblue Feb 2019 #41
Amazing melman Feb 2019 #58
This post reminds me of a biblical quote ismnotwasm Feb 2019 #71
+++ brer cat Feb 2019 #91
I'd imagine they use it draw attention to the concept rather than illustrate an alleged pride. LanternWaste Feb 2019 #61
This is inappropriate mcar Feb 2019 #79
All I can say is if certain things happen again, we better all start learning russian. Eliot Rosewater Feb 2019 #87
.... George II Feb 2019 #84
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ sheshe2 Feb 2019 #88
... NurseJackie Feb 2019 #93
Imo, Melman, that person is one of the more thoughtful Hortensis Feb 2019 #89
Strawmen zipplewrath Feb 2019 #16
I can see your points. It is a grey area irisblue Feb 2019 #34
I do get that part zipplewrath Feb 2019 #37
Not sealioning to ask for credible links/refs. Sealioning to never be satisfied & never stop. . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2019 #64
I have never seen this at DU. No, not once. Ever. Stinky The Clown Feb 2019 #19
I have to own up to being guilty of this Bucky Feb 2019 #25
I think that it is contextual. Caliman73 Feb 2019 #90
I'm not really sure where I fall on this. bearsfootball516 Feb 2019 #32
Near as I can tell zipplewrath Feb 2019 #38
Or asking someone to prove a negative... LisaM Feb 2019 #82
Interesting, I did not know it had a name apart from just ms liberty Feb 2019 #36
Easy one. grumpyduck Feb 2019 #39
I had"debates" with a couple of those in 2016. Panich52 Feb 2019 #40
Isn't That Just Being Obtuse? jayfish Feb 2019 #42
I like & use the term "being obtuse" as well. irisblue Feb 2019 #45
Right, But "Sealioning". jayfish Feb 2019 #49
... NurseJackie Feb 2019 #52
Okay, it is made up, as all language is. irisblue Feb 2019 #53
It isn't a term you can intuitively guess at either lunatica Feb 2019 #67
Nope. Some people just are dense. Sealioning is being WILLFULLY obtuse, repetitively, annoyingly. nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2019 #65
and, if a person does get emotional/angry in a response NewJeffCT Feb 2019 #46
And, any source given to them is immediately ignored. Oneironaut Feb 2019 #48
I didn't know there was a word for it, but there's plenty of it here. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2019 #54
Obviously we need a whole new type of dictionary lunatica Feb 2019 #59
We already have it. Fer'instance... JHB Feb 2019 #69
I think it depends on whether the person asking the question is doing so in good faith-they really jalan48 Feb 2019 #60
It seems a term like pretentious reasonableness lunatica Feb 2019 #72
Yes, the problem with online discussions is that many times the poster is just trolling jalan48 Feb 2019 #75
K&R geardaddy Feb 2019 #62
I see this everday on Twitter, I've seen it here quite a dewsgirl Feb 2019 #76
Ah, so that's what I've been seeing the past several days. The smell of fish should 've... Hekate Feb 2019 #80
I'm glad someone put a name to it. LisaM Feb 2019 #81
like the now banned TROLLberliner JI7 Feb 2019 #94
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sealioning, no not the an...»Reply #32