Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Caliman73

(11,767 posts)
11. Yes, because they are the largest social media sites.
Tue Mar 5, 2019, 06:56 PM
Mar 2019

There is also a wealth of good information on those sites. Anytime you have a more open platform where user content is the main source of posting, you are running a big risk of getting fake information, even coordinated fake information. The choice is how much do you want to spend in resources to go after the fake content? I am sure many would say, "as much as it takes to keep fake information out" but in a business that can be difficult and costly.


I don't know the solution. You don't want to over regulate to the point where ANY controversial content is stripped away because that could affect marginalized voices. Critical thinking skills being taught in school is probably a minimum intervention at this point.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anti-vaxx moms gets fake ...»Reply #11