Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

fleur-de-lisa

(14,704 posts)

5. Might be hard to prove:

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Wed Mar 6, 2019, 03:42 PM

Mar 2019

Renato Mariotti ✔@renato_mariotti

Prosecutors would have to show that the attorneys knew that the content was false for them to be implicated in suborning perjury. As for Trump, they would have to show that he was personally aware of what his attorneys were doing and directed them to do so.

Link to tweet

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WH lawyers could be on the hook for Michael Cohen's perjury. [View all] DetlefK Mar 2019 OP

Was McGahn involved in that? Grasswire2 Mar 2019 #1

Cohen mentioned by name Sekulow and Lowell (Jared's lawyer) during the hearing RockRaven Mar 2019 #3

thank you nt Grasswire2 Mar 2019 #4

Reportedly, MxGahan has refused some of trump's orders - and has spent hours with Mueller empedocles Mar 2019 #6

Very interesting, vulnerable area. empedocles Mar 2019 #2

Might be hard to prove: fleur-de-lisa Mar 2019 #5

Seriously? DetlefK Mar 2019 #7