Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Brawndo

(535 posts)

3. Yes, they should pack the Supreme Court

Reply to bluescribbler (Original post)

Fri Mar 8, 2019, 12:03 PM

Mar 2019

The flat out denial of Obama's SC pick Garland has not been addressed, failure to do so is to encourage them to do it again. The threat of republican retaliation for packing the court should only serve as a motivator to GOTV so they can't enact retaliation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Eric Holder says [View all] bluescribbler Mar 2019 OP

We should also discuss doing away with the lifetime appointment nonsense. Autumn Mar 2019 #1

I agree, but ... shhhh. Qutzupalotl Mar 2019 #2

Yes, they should pack the Supreme Court Brawndo Mar 2019 #3

Or, cut it by two 33taw Mar 2019 #4

Who gets to pick the two? Nt hughee99 Mar 2019 #5

I'd say last two in. But, legally I do not know if it is possiblel. 33taw Mar 2019 #7

It would amount to someone firing a SC justice, so it's not possible. hughee99 Mar 2019 #8

YES YES Grasswire2 Mar 2019 #6