Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can we just, for once, play the long game? [View all]Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)58. Thank you.
I'm a moderate...really. If I think that impeachment should be pursued if the evidence shows impeachable offenses, I'm pretty sure that's not a radical idea. It's our duty.
I don't see the point to all the investigations, if we don't impeach. Talk about divisive...all the investigations. And the cost is tens of millions of dollars.
Trump's response to Nancy's assurance that "we're not trying to impeach you": "That's good, Nancy. Because you don't impeach people who are doing a good job."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This isn't a game we are playing. If the President has committed impeachable offenses,
Honeycombe8
Mar 2019
#5
I want someone to explain how this is some masterful 3 d chess game move. Saw panelists
Laura PourMeADrink
Mar 2019
#63
Explanation maybe: Heard on MSNBC that Pelosi told Trump "we" aren't seeking impeachment.
Honeycombe8
Mar 2019
#67
But what's to gain from that? Just to say if it happens it will be because
Laura PourMeADrink
Mar 2019
#75
I understand that, but unfortunately impeachment is a POLITIAL process, not a legal one
themaguffin
Mar 2019
#98
So I guess George Bush wasn't worth the effort either. That turned out great.
BamaRefugee
Mar 2019
#11
My take on it, that was the moment that Republicans knew they could just go FULL BORE OBSTRUCTION
BamaRefugee
Mar 2019
#15
It meant we were able, just barely, to get Obamacare passed. He had a very short window
pnwmom
Mar 2019
#18
Yes, the Independent Sen. from CT, the heart of the insurance industry, cost us the public option.
pnwmom
Mar 2019
#37
It's not blind faith, but more knowing Pelosi knows how to play 3D chess better than I do
aeromanKC
Mar 2019
#47
Yes, agree, the more charges against the travesty of a president we have is good.
Laura PourMeADrink
Mar 2019
#56
I don't trust crushing them in the polls when the Russians are still helping the Republicans. There'
uponit7771
Mar 2019
#97
They dont have to be super when Trump ... HIMSELF ... sought after and received their help last time
uponit7771
Mar 2019
#100
I want him to be impeached by the House even though he won't be removed by the
deurbano
Mar 2019
#44
Not saying tRump is not worth impeaching would have been playing the long game.
CentralMass
Mar 2019
#48