Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

wryter2000

(46,039 posts)

12. You nailed it

Reply to zipplewrath (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 13, 2019, 01:41 PM

Mar 2019

Watergate didn't start out as impeachment. Do the investigations. Collect the evidence. The American people need to see his crimes. Then you can talk impeachment.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Philippe Reines: Stop drawing the wrong lessons from 1998 [View all] BeyondGeography Mar 2019 OP

This is roughly what everyone has been saying zipplewrath Mar 2019 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author ehrnst Mar 2019 #2

Exactly. It's smarter politics to just let the (very real) scandals drag out until election day 2020 sandensea Mar 2019 #8

You nailed it wryter2000 Mar 2019 #12

Baker started out to defend the president zipplewrath Mar 2019 #13

"considerably more credible" PatSeg Mar 2019 #3

+1000. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2019 #4

Unfortunately, "considerably more credible" does not have any effect on RepubliCons. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2019 #5

And one would be hard pressed PatSeg Mar 2019 #10

He wrote this to keep Dems from going wobbly BeyondGeography Mar 2019 #6

And it is quite possible PatSeg Mar 2019 #11

You know who dreams impeachment? Pence Perseus Mar 2019 #7

I keep going back to the bare-bones basics of how the GOP made a complete mockery calimary Mar 2019 #9