General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Our friends at JPR seem to have lost their unity... [View all]Hortensis
(58,785 posts)to sell them as different. And they certainly turned out to be when ALL expert analyses found them unworkable as presented.
Most of those who "flocked" to Sanders in repudiation of the Democratic Party did so because he presented himself as a populist leader feeding mindless hostilities toward "elites," focusing them above all not on Republicans but on the Democratic Party's evil establishment. Our Democratic platform of widespread progressive and civil rights advances just didn't satisfy that resentful populist urge to tear down. Misogyny was huge, also, of course, but came natural to many in this crowd.
There is a definite authoritarian note to his delivery, also, which I noted from the beginning. That compelling "I alone can fix it" note from both him and Trump. You might want to read up on authoritarian populism to help understand why somewhere between 12 and 20% of Sanders' followers voted for Trump or anti-progressive libertarian Johnson.
Looking at this left-wing leader that way also helps explain how he could try to illicitly take the primary nomination away from the majority of Democratic voters. He believed his followers would support oversetting the democratic process. Enthusiastically. And my observations of the rage of the JPR types when he failed were that he was appallingly, frighteningly correct.