General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hey DU community! I love you, but nobody seems interested in... [View all]DemocracyMouse
(2,275 posts)It's like this:
1) Burn oil and coal.
2) Put soot in air.
3) Burn more fossil fuels.
4) Blanket planet in a thick layer of gases which traps heat, warms oceans, stirs up hurricanes...
5) OIL COMPANIES AND THE 1% BUY THEIR WAY INTO SHRINKING PLANETARY SAFE ZONES.
Then the pendulum swings back to sanity:
6) CITIZENS WAKE UP, STOP WATCHING FOOTBALL AND CLOWN PRESIDENTS, AND NOTICE THAT SCIENTISTS EXIST.
7) Citizens pressure ALL candidates to make "addressing global warming" a high priority.
8) Better yet, citizens pressure ALL candidates to link investment in clean, cheap solar energy with a return to traditional tax rates (hence not radical) and traditional levels of investment in civic infrastructure like education, public transportation and even civic architecture.
9) Greenhouse gases subside. Worst outcomes avoided.
We may not return to a pastoral 18th century, but the worst outcomes are avoided and our grandchildren will thank us. (Assuming we listen to the scientists, not the clowns).
Reducing greenhouse gases is sensible, scientific and doable. Empathetic stewardship of the Earth is even a tradition in all the world's religions.
Let's stop wasting time on the Great Clown and get this traditional priority back in the saddle. Polluting the Earth is radical. Healing the Earth is a sound, sacred and sensible tradition. Don't let Russian trolls and clown presidents tell you otherwise.