Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Eugene

(67,289 posts)
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 10:16 AM Mar 2019

The Boeing 737 Max crisis goes way beyond software [View all]

Source: Quartz

The Boeing 737 Max crisis goes way beyond software

By Tim Fernholz 4 hours ago

There is no small complexity in the task of carrying hundreds of people through the sky at hundreds of miles an hour. More than 100,000 airliners take off and land each day, but two deadly air crashes in six months have shocked passengers, regulators, and industry alike.

Crashes of Boeing’s 737 Max in Indonesia and Ethiopia offer a window into all that complexity. Boeing and its CEO Dennis Muilenburg want the story to be simple: a software problem that can be fixed with a quick patch. But that doesn’t capture the mistakes made by Boeing and American aviation regulators in certifying the plane to carry passengers.

By now, you may well have heard of MCAS, software that automatically pitches 737 Maxes downward to avoid stalling in mid-air. It exists only because Boeing wanted to upgrade its 737 without changing it fundamentally—so it added new engines that made the aircraft more likely to stall, rather than starting from scratch. In the emerging picture of the two accidents, the software only failed because the mechanical sensor it depended on also malfunctioned.

But all that pales next to what will likely be the highlight of investigations into the incident: the training and user experience of the people in the cockpits. Pilots did not have sufficient training to understand how MCAS worked, and two vital safety features—a display showing what the sensor detected, and a light warning if other sensors disagreed—were optional extras (paywall).

Minimizing training and cockpit changes was an economic decision: The upgraded plane would be more attractive to potential purchasers if they did not have to spend expensive hours retraining their pilots. The Federal Aviation Administration determined Boeing’s training and safety plans were fine. Now, investigators want to know why. The answers could be costly for Boeing, and for America’s reputation as a leader in the safe deployment of aviation technology.

-snip-


Read more: https://qz.com/1577986/the-boeing-737-max-crisis-goes-way-beyond-software/
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
May Boeing's life Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #1
Very important malaise Mar 2019 #2
There are other examples of optional software MontanaMama Mar 2019 #3
If someone at FAA or DOT were to declare the Max 8 safe, and there was another crash DFW Mar 2019 #5
I would like to think so. MontanaMama Mar 2019 #15
Is pilot training is a crap shoot when out of the US? CloudWatcher Mar 2019 #16
Agree. eom. MontanaMama Mar 2019 #18
Strangely enough... jmowreader Mar 2019 #22
Wouldn't have mattered Sgent Mar 2019 #23
They may not own sims but they can buy time somewhere rickford66 Mar 2019 #26
This was willfully missed Johnny2X2X Mar 2019 #4
It's not about software or sensor malfunction, it's a design flaw... brush Mar 2019 #11
Oh, I suspect it will survive though it will be years before the tarnish wears off. cstanleytech Mar 2019 #12
More powerful engines Johnny2X2X Mar 2019 #17
Didn't Boeing take the cheap route by adapting an existing design... brush Mar 2019 #20
It sure. Johnny2X2X Mar 2019 #24
They tried Sgent Mar 2019 #25
Boeing 737 is the new Pinto. keithbvadu2 Mar 2019 #6
More like the new Ford Focus. cstanleytech Mar 2019 #13
Not the "737" but the "737 MAX". The 737 new gen is one of the best and safest ever built. lostnfound Mar 2019 #27
Valid point - 737 MAX keithbvadu2 Mar 2019 #28
Furthermore. Johnny2X2X Mar 2019 #7
Boeing failed because they did not want the pilots to know about MCAS LiberalArkie Mar 2019 #8
Instead of "job killing regulations" we have no life saving protections. TheOther95Percent Mar 2019 #9
It is utter negligence BlueFlorida Mar 2019 #10
I'm sure the lawsuits will tie them up in courts for years. I also think this is big stain on what yaesu Mar 2019 #14
FMS Johnny2X2X Mar 2019 #19
Not only did Boeing fail... Mr. Sparkle Mar 2019 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Boeing 737 Max crisis...