Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(135,774 posts)
Fri Mar 29, 2019, 09:06 PM Mar 2019

Judge blocks California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds [View all]

A federal judge in California on Friday ruled against the Golden State’s ban on gun magazines that are able to hold more than 10 rounds.

U.S. District Court Judge Roger T. Benitez said the rule violates the Second Amendment and infringes upon citizens’ rights to defend themselves.

“California’s law prohibiting acquisition and possession of magazines able to hold any more than 10 rounds places a severe restriction on the core right of self-defense of the home such that it amounts to a destruction of the right and is unconstitutional under any level of scrutiny,” he wrote in an 86-page decision.

“California’s ban is far-reaching, absolute, and permanent. The ban on acquisition and possession on magazines able to hold more than 10 rounds, together with the substantial criminal penalties threatening a law-abiding, responsible, citizen who desires such magazines to protect hearth and home, imposes a burden on the constitutional right that this Court judges as severe.”

Benitez, a George W. Bush appointee who serves on the bench for the Southern District of California, also wrote that California’s ban unfairly impacts a wide swath of the state’s gun owners, as many choose to use magazines containing over 10 rounds for their defense.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/436537-judge-strikes-down-californias-ban-on-magazines-holding-more-than-10

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California. Ignore the ruling and enforce the law anyway. roamer65 Mar 2019 #1
Great idea! BigmanPigman Mar 2019 #3
Dumb idea. No they can't. former9thward Mar 2019 #16
Why even suggest such an idea. Come on! Joe941 Mar 2019 #28
Can red states ignore judges and enforce their anti-abortion laws? hack89 Mar 2019 #4
They already are through intimidation of women and abortion clinics. roamer65 Mar 2019 #5
So only ignore the rulings that you disagree with? Polybius Mar 2019 #12
While the wording of the ruling isn't inconsequential... Socal31 Mar 2019 #2
I took a cursory look at the ruling DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2019 #11
En Banc prediction? Socal31 Mar 2019 #14
Yep DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2019 #17
It sounds like we also agree on the likely outcome. Socal31 Mar 2019 #18
More than ten rounds are needed to defend against WHAT exactly? DFW Mar 2019 #6
Really gratuitous Mar 2019 #7
Better question malaise Mar 2019 #8
Could well be DFW Mar 2019 #9
It's an arbitrary number krispos42 Mar 2019 #13
Handguns MFM008 Mar 2019 #27
Compared to shoulder-fired guns. krispos42 Mar 2019 #34
An incel defending himself against a sorority? n/t Crunchy Frog Mar 2019 #25
The ruling cites several specific home invasions where it was possibly significant Amishman Mar 2019 #33
he says this "imposes a burden" Takket Mar 2019 #10
Are you suggesting that 10 is an arbitrary number? hack89 Mar 2019 #15
No. Takket Mar 2019 #19
So why did they pick 10? hack89 Mar 2019 #29
The ruling certainly doesn't rely on the home invasion example. Socal31 Mar 2019 #20
Just tax each round of ammo. LiberalFighter Mar 2019 #21
There are already severe restrictions on the sale of ammo in California ansible Mar 2019 #22
.. roamer65 Mar 2019 #24
There is already a federal excise tax on ammo. hack89 Mar 2019 #30
Your honor, I'm struggling to live without a tank moondust Mar 2019 #23
Don't worry - both are legal if you have a shit ton of money. Nt hack89 Mar 2019 #31
"well-regulated militia" Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2019 #26
When was this golden age when they took away your gun if you were not in the militia? hack89 Mar 2019 #32
nice strawman Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2019 #35
There have always been gun regulations hack89 Mar 2019 #36
That judge is a fucking idiot. Goodheart Mar 2019 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge blocks California's...