Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

malaise

(296,199 posts)

8. Better question

Reply to DFW (Reply #6)

Fri Mar 29, 2019, 09:54 PM

Mar 2019

Has LaPierre thrown him a bone?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge blocks California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2019 OP

California. Ignore the ruling and enforce the law anyway. roamer65 Mar 2019 #1

Great idea! BigmanPigman Mar 2019 #3

Dumb idea. No they can't. former9thward Mar 2019 #16

Why even suggest such an idea. Come on! Joe941 Mar 2019 #28

Can red states ignore judges and enforce their anti-abortion laws? hack89 Mar 2019 #4

They already are through intimidation of women and abortion clinics. roamer65 Mar 2019 #5

So only ignore the rulings that you disagree with? Polybius Mar 2019 #12

While the wording of the ruling isn't inconsequential... Socal31 Mar 2019 #2

I took a cursory look at the ruling DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2019 #11

En Banc prediction? Socal31 Mar 2019 #14

Yep DetroitLegalBeagle Mar 2019 #17

It sounds like we also agree on the likely outcome. Socal31 Mar 2019 #18

More than ten rounds are needed to defend against WHAT exactly? DFW Mar 2019 #6

Really gratuitous Mar 2019 #7

Better question malaise Mar 2019 #8

Could well be DFW Mar 2019 #9

It's an arbitrary number krispos42 Mar 2019 #13

Handguns MFM008 Mar 2019 #27

Compared to shoulder-fired guns. krispos42 Mar 2019 #34

An incel defending himself against a sorority? n/t Crunchy Frog Mar 2019 #25

The ruling cites several specific home invasions where it was possibly significant Amishman Mar 2019 #33

he says this "imposes a burden" Takket Mar 2019 #10

Are you suggesting that 10 is an arbitrary number? hack89 Mar 2019 #15

No. Takket Mar 2019 #19

So why did they pick 10? hack89 Mar 2019 #29

The ruling certainly doesn't rely on the home invasion example. Socal31 Mar 2019 #20

Just tax each round of ammo. LiberalFighter Mar 2019 #21

There are already severe restrictions on the sale of ammo in California ansible Mar 2019 #22

.. roamer65 Mar 2019 #24

There is already a federal excise tax on ammo. hack89 Mar 2019 #30

Your honor, I'm struggling to live without a tank moondust Mar 2019 #23

Don't worry - both are legal if you have a shit ton of money. Nt hack89 Mar 2019 #31

"well-regulated militia" Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2019 #26

When was this golden age when they took away your gun if you were not in the militia? hack89 Mar 2019 #32

nice strawman Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2019 #35

There have always been gun regulations hack89 Mar 2019 #36

That judge is a fucking idiot. Goodheart Mar 2019 #37