Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Barr's legacy on the line as Mueller team fumes [View all]suffragette
(12,232 posts)9. Because Barr got away with it before in cleaning up after Iran-Contra. That is his real legacy.
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/14/684553791/william-barr-supported-pardons-in-an-earlier-d-c-witch-hunt-iran-contra
NYT article from back then notes how the pardons shut down the Special Prosecutors investigation.
https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html
Bush Pardons 6 in Iran Affair, Aborting a Weinberger Trial; Prosecutor Assails 'Cover-Up'
Note that the NYT article also places obstruction and conspiracy as central issues then.
No coincidence that Trump brought him aboard as his fixer now.
Then-Attorney General Barr supported the president's decision in the Iran-Contra case, which gave clemency to people who had been officials in the administration of President Ronald Reagan, including former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger. He had been set to go on trial to face charges about lying to Congress.
To the man who led the Iran-Contra investigation, however, the pardons represented a miscarriage of justice.
~~~
"It demonstrates that powerful people with powerful allies can commit serious crimes in high office, deliberately abusing the public trust without consequences," said Lawrence Walsh, the independent prosecutor in the case, at the time of the pardons.
"I favored the broadest pardon authority," Barr said. "There were some people just arguing just for Weinberger. I said, 'No in for a penny, in for a pound.' "
To the man who led the Iran-Contra investigation, however, the pardons represented a miscarriage of justice.
~~~
"It demonstrates that powerful people with powerful allies can commit serious crimes in high office, deliberately abusing the public trust without consequences," said Lawrence Walsh, the independent prosecutor in the case, at the time of the pardons.
"I favored the broadest pardon authority," Barr said. "There were some people just arguing just for Weinberger. I said, 'No in for a penny, in for a pound.' "
NYT article from back then notes how the pardons shut down the Special Prosecutors investigation.
https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html
Bush Pardons 6 in Iran Affair, Aborting a Weinberger Trial; Prosecutor Assails 'Cover-Up'
Six years after the arms-for-hostages scandal began to cast a shadow that would darken two Administrations, President Bush today granted full pardons to six former officials in Ronald Reagan's Administration, including former Defense Secretary Caspar W. Weinberger.
Mr. Weinberger was scheduled to stand trial on Jan. 5 on charges that he lied to Congress about his knowledge of the arms sales to Iran and efforts by other countries to help underwrite the Nicaraguan rebels, a case that was expected to focus on Mr. Weinberger's private notes that contain references to Mr. Bush's endorsement of the secret shipments to Iran.
But in a single stroke, Mr. Bush swept away one conviction, three guilty pleas and two pending cases, virtually decapitating what was left of Mr. Walsh's effort, which began in 1986. Mr. Bush's decision was announced by the White House in a printed statement after the President left for Camp David, where he will spend the Christmas holiday.
Mr. Walsh bitterly condemned the President's action, charging that "the Iran-contra cover-up, which has continued for more than six years, has now been completed."
Mr. Weinberger was scheduled to stand trial on Jan. 5 on charges that he lied to Congress about his knowledge of the arms sales to Iran and efforts by other countries to help underwrite the Nicaraguan rebels, a case that was expected to focus on Mr. Weinberger's private notes that contain references to Mr. Bush's endorsement of the secret shipments to Iran.
But in a single stroke, Mr. Bush swept away one conviction, three guilty pleas and two pending cases, virtually decapitating what was left of Mr. Walsh's effort, which began in 1986. Mr. Bush's decision was announced by the White House in a printed statement after the President left for Camp David, where he will spend the Christmas holiday.
Mr. Walsh bitterly condemned the President's action, charging that "the Iran-contra cover-up, which has continued for more than six years, has now been completed."
Note that the NYT article also places obstruction and conspiracy as central issues then.
No coincidence that Trump brought him aboard as his fixer now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He's lucky he had any 'legacy'...and now it will be where it belongs...in the crapper. nt
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#5
The only thing I could think of was to "protect the RepubliCON establishment"...????? nt
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#6
Because Barr got away with it before in cleaning up after Iran-Contra. That is his real legacy.
suffragette
Apr 2019
#9
Yes. And also central to both was that an election was impacted in favor of Republicans.
suffragette
Apr 2019
#24
Yes! As I and many others have said. Charge Barr with obstruction of justice and impeach him!
manor321
Apr 2019
#4
Interesting. During dinner spouse wondered why did Barr even want the job
question everything
Apr 2019
#14