Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

THE MATH IS NOT THERE... lame54 Apr 2019 #1
There is a clock on that shot and we can't afford to let it run out without an attempt. Runningdawg Apr 2019 #2
BINGO!!! InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2019 #48
Damn the math; full speed ahead! delisen Apr 2019 #71
ITS NOT ABOUT MATH ITS ABOUT DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #6
It is SO ABOUT MATH... lame54 Apr 2019 #14
Empower him to do what? Violate the emoluments clause daily on live TV ?! That empowerment?! uponit7771 Apr 2019 #29
Empower him to get re-elected. n/t pnwmom Apr 2019 #35
That's not what happened with Republicans did such, Bush was elected after Clinton uponit7771 Apr 2019 #45
Clinton was more popular after his failed impeachment than before. pnwmom Apr 2019 #52
Right, republicans won while doing their job of impeaching Clinton. We can do the same and do our uponit7771 Apr 2019 #57
No, it's just very rare to get that third term, and Gore wasn't as personally popular as Clinton. nt pnwmom Apr 2019 #62
I don't see Trump becoming as popular as Clinton if he's impeached for openly violating constitution uponit7771 Apr 2019 #64
It all depends on the evidence that can be uncovered against him, and Pelosi's in the position pnwmom Apr 2019 #66
There's nothing to "uncover" he's violating the emoluments clause as we type with Mira-Logos ... uponit7771 Apr 2019 #67
His charity collapsed in illegality Mr Tibbs Apr 2019 #155
Clinton was more popular, but people voted against Al Gore because they couldn't vote against Aristus Apr 2019 #61
RIGHT !!! and there'd be few people who'd bet Red Don would become MORE popular after he's impeached uponit7771 Apr 2019 #65
Clinton Lost it for Gore McKim Apr 2019 #133
The 2000 "election" was a stolen election. Clinton did not lose it for Gore. diva77 Apr 2019 #166
Clinton was also more popular than Trump before his impeachment delisen Apr 2019 #72
Thanks to Nader mcar Apr 2019 #84
The midterms after Clinton impeachment were mcar Apr 2019 #83
Again, I'll put good money on it that Trump will never reach Clinton's popularity with democrats uponit7771 Apr 2019 #91
He doesn't care about any law anymore, except perhaps, murder by himself. Lock individual1 up Apr 2019 #108
You have raised the alarm!!!! ehrnst Apr 2019 #139
He doesn't care about any law at this point. He's broken so many... Lock individual1 up Apr 2019 #142
The constitution makes it very hard to unseat a POTUS. ehrnst Apr 2019 #143
That's an excuse for not doing what must be done against an alleged felon... Lock individual1 up Apr 2019 #144
Yes, exactly. What, enpower him to appoint more Supreme Court Justice(s)? Cage more kids? Nevermypresident Apr 2019 #164
Feel free to post your evidence Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #93
Thanks for your evidence... lame54 Apr 2019 #98
You made the initial assertion, the burden of proof lies with you Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #100
I'm thinking it is impossible at this time... lame54 Apr 2019 #104
Unless the Muller report comes out with the goods and even republicans will get sick about the info Perseus Apr 2019 #131
The people don't want it Trumpocalypse Apr 2019 #130
The people didn't favour impeaching Nixon right away Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #136
The tide turned against Nixon Trumpocalypse Apr 2019 #146
The evidence is already there for the taking Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #149
And the people are still against impeachment Trumpocalypse Apr 2019 #156
I don't consider defending the Constitution useless Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #158
It is useless Trumpocalypse Apr 2019 #159
Nice to know you put party before country nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #161
That's uncalled for because that is not what I said Trumpocalypse Apr 2019 #162
And we cannot afford to lose the election. gldstwmn Apr 2019 #17
This is false on its face, there's no math for removal but impeachment there is the math uponit7771 Apr 2019 #20
Agreed. Mike Niendorff Apr 2019 #28
+1, his emoluments violations alone are a multiple shot along with insurance fraud. uponit7771 Apr 2019 #30
+1 Kurt V. Apr 2019 #60
His charity collapsed in illegality Mr Tibbs Apr 2019 #116
this too !! I'm thinking someone has a list of crap this guy has done illegally that we know of uponit7771 Apr 2019 #122
this is not provable. you have no way if knowing how these senators would vote Kurt V. Apr 2019 #55
The premise is that we impeach now knowing what we know now... lame54 Apr 2019 #97
Thank you mcar Apr 2019 #81
Then have public hearings and reveal the boatload of Trump crimes NewJeffCT Apr 2019 #126
Depends on how high the stakes are made for them. Grasswire2 Apr 2019 #153
Can't we wait and see what's in Mueller's Report before we make a decision? Those who want to make politicaljunkie41910 Apr 2019 #147
I agree - I was responding... lame54 Apr 2019 #150
Impeachment without conviction is a waste of time Buckeyeblue Apr 2019 #3
If congress vote to impeach, The Senate must convene Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #7
What's the time frame? Buckeyeblue Apr 2019 #15
Good question- but the question would be in Mitch's court Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #18
Who would shut down the government? Buckeyeblue Apr 2019 #40
It's not like the legislative process- if articles of impeachment pass, a trial must be held Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #96
But the Senate has to "adopt an order" letting the House know it's ready to proceed Buckeyeblue Apr 2019 #113
We are in a constitutional crisis already Amyishere Apr 2019 #152
the penalty would be at the voting booth and that's something turtle gets Kurt V. Apr 2019 #59
I think he'd put it all on his shoulders to keep the others from having to go on record with a vote Buckeyeblue Apr 2019 #70
I've been to Kentucky many times. it is beautiful Kurt V. Apr 2019 #74
Oh, yeah? Like he had to hold a vote on Obama's Supreme Court nominee? n/t pnwmom Apr 2019 #36
No, like he had to hold a vote on Trump's emergency declaration. Fiendish Thingy Apr 2019 #95
And what if McConnell simply refuses pnwmom Apr 2019 #102
This is false, impeachment doesn't mean conviction or removal uponit7771 Apr 2019 #22
Or he may hold a trial, expedite it as much as possible, call a vote.....and the Senate will acquit. WillowTree Apr 2019 #140
They DID NOT say no on this yet. TIMING will be so critical! bluestarone Apr 2019 #4
I'd like to believe that but hugely doubtful. Pelosi didn't even want to impeach bush who with Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #111
Jesus! Cut it out, will ya? NurseJackie Apr 2019 #5
Beating your head isn't going to change this. Kurt V. Apr 2019 #82
It's just an animated gif. NurseJackie Apr 2019 #85
I'm thinking you mean it Kurt V. Apr 2019 #86
Think again. NurseJackie Apr 2019 #87
i always do Kurt V. Apr 2019 #88
Clearly not this time. NurseJackie Apr 2019 #90
how so? btw i can't roll on the floor either without serious encouragement. lol. Kurt V. Apr 2019 #92
Nurse Jackie.. kentuck Apr 2019 #89
They already made the mistake MurrayDelph Apr 2019 #8
Where was the evidence? There was no evidence. gldstwmn Apr 2019 #19
Good grief. Sigh. Hortensis Apr 2019 #9
The candidates should avoid that issue like the plague. gldstwmn Apr 2019 #21
Of course. :) I was just suggesting a nice twist on the Hortensis Apr 2019 #54
You're comfortable. I'm comfortable. Empathy should not be constrained by that. Kurt V. Apr 2019 #73
He can be impeached but will not be found guilty by this Senate. allgood33 Apr 2019 #10
History will show customerserviceguy Apr 2019 #11
I think you mean Andrew Johnson. Lionel Mandrake Apr 2019 #58
We can guess based on the Andrew Johnson impeachment marylandblue Apr 2019 #12
History will show that the House did not perform it's constitutional duty. I was naive all my adult Nevermypresident Apr 2019 #13
Amen McKim Apr 2019 #134
The Senate does not vote for or against impeachment. WillowTree Apr 2019 #141
I'm aware that the Senate's role in impeachment is the actual trial, if you will, where upon Nevermypresident Apr 2019 #163
Ummmm.......no. Again, the Senate does not vote for or against impeachment. WillowTree Apr 2019 #165
Semantics!! I stand corrected LOL. Nevermypresident Apr 2019 #168
Well we'd need evidence first. gldstwmn Apr 2019 #16
There's enough evidence to impeach Trump on emoluments violations ALONE. uponit7771 Apr 2019 #24
Then what? Mitch McConnell shrugs his shoulders? gldstwmn Apr 2019 #26
Yes, just that ... then let the voters decide. Abdicating our jobs cause they don't do there's is uponit7771 Apr 2019 #27
I'm not ready to take that roll of the dice. gldstwmn Apr 2019 #32
Republicans did and won when they did their jobs. uponit7771 Apr 2019 #33
Different times. gldstwmn Apr 2019 #34
We agree, Red Don is even less popular than Gore was which means dems should do their jobs uponit7771 Apr 2019 #47
Seriously? Mr Tibbs Apr 2019 #125
Let's see what we learn from the various investigations struggle4progress Apr 2019 #23
Unless the GOP is in agreement, it would be a gigantic gift to Trump for the 2020 election. Vinca Apr 2019 #25
many here agree with this. but - Kurt V. Apr 2019 #63
What an appallingly blind OP. Where do you believe Democrats will get 67 Senators to vote for OnDoutside Apr 2019 #31
Same thing Repubs said before.... kentuck Apr 2019 #38
What evidence do you have to support that assertion ? McCain, who knew he was going to die ? OnDoutside Apr 2019 #42
Thats like....your opinion, man... kentuck Apr 2019 #43
He will die by death by a thousand cuts kimbutgar Apr 2019 #37
Unless something dreadful happens.. kentuck Apr 2019 #39
" he's just not worth it" , House Speaker Nancy Pelosi . stonecutter357 Apr 2019 #41
Is safeguarding the country worth it? BlueWI Apr 2019 #145
republicans have been stretching the envelope Harker Apr 2019 #44
will history report the GOP should not have aided the moron in chief. pansypoo53219 Apr 2019 #46
I would start Impeachment proceedings NNYCDN51 Apr 2019 #49
+1, with those proceedings congress can get GJ info and tax returns while calling the obstruction of uponit7771 Apr 2019 #69
history will show majority of white people supported trump JI7 Apr 2019 #50
It's always easier to look back and see what the right and clear thing is to do. I think History UniteFightBack Apr 2019 #51
No matter what happens, it is ALWAYS all the Dems fault elfin Apr 2019 #53
there is still time but its fading Kurt V. Apr 2019 #56
*******************YES !!! ************************* If they have the evidence and do nothing uponit7771 Apr 2019 #68
YES. I'm so disgusted and disappointed in our "system." ecstatic Apr 2019 #75
There is still time. elleng Apr 2019 #76
Will history record that Democrats helped Trump win a second term by impeaching him? brooklynite Apr 2019 #77
Will history record that Dems helped Trump win by being too timid to prosecute him? Mr Tibbs Apr 2019 #117
I guess that depends on whether or not voters want Trump impeached (they don't). brooklynite Apr 2019 #120
Having a trial in the Senate is impossible. Historic NY Apr 2019 #78
A couple of points Lithos Apr 2019 #79
It's like riding with a drunk driver... kentuck Apr 2019 #80
I do not agree with that analogy Lithos Apr 2019 #94
Excellent sober analysis. Completely agree with your points. VOX Apr 2019 #115
No. nt Baltimike Apr 2019 #99
NO! nt Raine Apr 2019 #101
Impeach Trump if you want 4 more years. Bank it redstateblues Apr 2019 #103
No! at140 Apr 2019 #105
+1. N/t obnoxiousdrunk Apr 2019 #107
Nancy is right redstateblues Apr 2019 #106
Nixon's pardon was a mistake SCantiGOP Apr 2019 #109
Sometimes I wistfully imagine Ford didn't pardon Nixon and what that America would be like. tclambert Apr 2019 #124
Your reasoning is exactly why I said the Nixon pardon was a mistake SCantiGOP Apr 2019 #132
Yes absolutely positively 100%. It is and was already a huge zero savvy mistake!!! Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2019 #110
+1 Joe941 Apr 2019 #119
No..I call for impeachment procedures to happen scardycat Apr 2019 #112
And the prize we win should a Senate miracle happen? Socal31 Apr 2019 #114
History will not be kind to any of us. Dave Starsky Apr 2019 #118
Providing there is a future of course.... the_sly_pig Apr 2019 #121
Bingo! kentuck Apr 2019 #123
It's a Constitutional Option....Not a duty. No where in the Constitution is "Duty" stated. AncientGeezer Apr 2019 #128
The duty is to the Constitution... the_sly_pig Apr 2019 #157
"Do something before it's too late." What would that be? AncientGeezer Apr 2019 #167
Senate republicans should be forced ... the_sly_pig Apr 2019 #170
Horse dead. Still beating it. matt819 Apr 2019 #127
Or that Republicans made a huge mistake in protecting him at all cost? Zambero Apr 2019 #129
Where is the Party of morality? kentuck Apr 2019 #135
This is not the Nixon Senate homegirl Apr 2019 #137
What I'm hearing around here Bettie Apr 2019 #138
I think the lack of accountability is damaging America beyond repair mountain grammy Apr 2019 #148
No. Fact is, impeachment does nothing without the Senate. Bradical79 Apr 2019 #151
Politically pointless. Win or lose, we lose. JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2019 #154
Well, the story isn't over yet... Blue_Tires Apr 2019 #160
at this point, it looks like we're just about done with history 0rganism Apr 2019 #169
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will history record that ...»Reply #166