Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(28,764 posts)

11. Worse

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #10)

Thu Apr 11, 2019, 12:22 PM

Apr 2019

There’s no need to stall. They could even insist that the prosecutors (the House picks those) submit everything confidentially... and then just vote against conviction.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Not sure if this has been asked before BUT [View all] bluestarone Apr 2019 OP

No appeal process FBaggins Apr 2019 #1

I understand that is NOT completely clear in the constitution? bluestarone Apr 2019 #2

I don't think the Supreme Court does any investigation at all lunatica Apr 2019 #3

The question wasn't about the Supreme Court. euphorb Apr 2019 #5

That's correct. The Supreme Court's role in a Senate impeachment trial MineralMan Apr 2019 #7

So is it correct tha only the Supreme Justice can preside over lunatica Apr 2019 #9

The Constitution requires the Chief Justice to preside. MineralMan Apr 2019 #13

Actually, the Constitution is crystal clear on the topic FBaggins Apr 2019 #4

TY! so does the chief justice determine whether or not (and when)the senate does their job? bluestarone Apr 2019 #6

The Chief Justice doesn't make any rules. The Senate controls the timing. Shrike47 Apr 2019 #8

OK gotcha TY bluestarone Apr 2019 #10

Worse FBaggins Apr 2019 #11

WOW! Bad deal for sure bluestarone Apr 2019 #12