Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just now on France24 [View all]Texin
(2,851 posts)50. It's not just the weight & volume of the water, it's the velocity at which it would fall.
Coupled with the force of the water being used by the hoses on the ground, the structural pressures of an old building - even one of massive stone like ND - would undergo tremendous structural strain. All anyone need do is look at a photo of the Grand Canyon and be able to appreciate what the force of water (among other things) does to things over time, let alone in one frantic dump onto an architectural historical wonder from the 12th Century.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I would like someone to explain to me why dropping water on the fire is wrong.
olegramps
Apr 2019
#9
Weakened structures can't take the impact. Dropping TONS of water from a height... plus side impacts
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#25
It's not just the weight & volume of the water, it's the velocity at which it would fall.
Texin
Apr 2019
#50
I briefly wondered if they could drop fire retardant chemicals. Then common sense took hold
Siwsan
Apr 2019
#2
I am waiting, frankly, for President Obama to say something graceful and appropriate...
Hekate
Apr 2019
#4
you just know Trump will say that, "if they'd only used water bombs, like I said..."
RussBLib
Apr 2019
#12
But he saw planed dropping water on TV. . . . . . (didn't notice the forest thing though)
pdsimdars
Apr 2019
#14
First time I heard that I thought about the secondary damage it would cause & trump talked
yaesu
Apr 2019
#15
"Trump Cathedral was actually before the Notre Dame the tallest cathedral in downtown Paris...
Efilroft Sul
Apr 2019
#16
As Alice Roosevelt Longworth said about her father, Teddy. It applies to 45 "bigly"
SharonAnn
Apr 2019
#28
Next up: Trump "If they'd rake their cathedrals they wouldn't have these problems"
ET Awful
Apr 2019
#21
The fact he is so ready to comment about things he knows nothing about with authority is disturbing.
Trenzalore
Apr 2019
#29
"The whole world knows he is an idiot" EXCEPT 40 SOMETHING PERCENT OF OUR VOTERS
Laura PourMeADrink
Apr 2019
#34
I think they did consider this in the post-Katrina fires in New Orleans
ThoughtCriminal
Apr 2019
#42
"Maybe if I talk about stuff I don't know anything about, everybody will forget Russia!"
struggle4progress
Apr 2019
#46
He's certainly gone out of his way to make sure the entire effing world knows he's a moron
lindysalsagal
Apr 2019
#47