A case based on jealousy and innuendo, the hounding of Lance Armstrong.

[DanTex]

39. But you're the one trying to put words in the prosecutor's mouth.

You're the one claiming that the fact that they dropped the case somehow implies that they didn't find evidence enough to prove that Lance Armstrong was doping. But there's no basis for that claim. The prosecutors didn't find enough evidence to bring a criminal case, which is an entirely different thing.

In terms of facts, there is a huge volume of evidence that Lance Armstrong doped, including two positive tests, eyewitness testimony from a dozen or so witnesses (including former teammates, a masseuse, an assistant, ...), the fact that he was able to handily beat other world-class racers who were doped to the gills, and now the fact that the agency officially in charged of doping control has banned him and revoked all his titles.