Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Neal Katyal: "Must look at p2 of Report." He's discussing this now on MSNBC. [View all]mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)11. This is probably specific to campaign-finance violations ... I'm sure Mueller was quoting the
statute accurately here. You have to show the finance violation was done 'willfully' in violation of the law, apparently.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Neal Katyal: "Must look at p2 of Report." He's discussing this now on MSNBC. [View all]
Miles Archer
Apr 2019
OP
This is probably specific to campaign-finance violations ... I'm sure Mueller was quoting the
mr_lebowski
Apr 2019
#11
I'm disappointed if this was Mueller, we need to talk to Mueller quick fast yesterday.
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#17
No. Govt has to prove accused had "mens rea", criminal intent. High bar. Jr ignorant, Manafort not.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#19
Willfully"... with general knowledge of the illegality of conduct.." sounds like intent comes down t
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#21
"intent" is not written into speeding regulations, because negligence is not a defense there.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#24
Well, duh, yeah, of course, I didn't state otherwise. Intent is written in, but NOT for speeding.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#32
Dons ... INTENT ... was to get dirt on Clinton from the Russians. Don's knowledge of the legality
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#36
Maybe he was afraid of bucking DOJ policy against criminally indicting a sitting President?
Tommy_Carcetti
Apr 2019
#4
Where Mueller had provable cases he got convictions. House-Senate impeachment-conviction lower bar.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#20
Yes. Life is complicated & hard to put everything into subject line, though I try my best. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#35
He didn't necessarily even "feel," he was following the incredibly thin amount of policy he knew of
coti
Apr 2019
#10
I believe he's referring to 'in terms of wording in this report', not in terms of 'how he conducted
mr_lebowski
Apr 2019
#12
He accepted long standing Justice Dept guidelines that sitting Presidents can't be indicted
Tom Rinaldo
Apr 2019
#16
Mueller follows the book. rarely loses cases. He wins. Not a white wash. Also wait for his testimony
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#22
Trump knows he is a criminal & guilty. I agree w you. Mueller didn't whitewash or sugar-coat. . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2019
#23