Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Good Julian vs Bad Julian [View all]AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)28. On what factual basis do you claim that "Julian Assange is a Euro-trash asshole who's spent his
entire adult life treating women like shit"?
Is there a factual basis for this?
Is there a factual basis for this?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't doubt that governments (mainly ours) would love to get their hands on him.
Chorophyll
Aug 2012
#20
If ad hominem arguments can be used to convict anybody, then we should all agree that he is guilty.
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#26
Then he needs to face the music in Sweden, regardless of how we characterize his behavior.
randome
Aug 2012
#29
It is an extreme example. But an extreme example of what? He's not Polanski and he is not
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#42
Thank you for your request. Please let me assure you that I am not "attempting to read" your mind.
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#63
I agree with you that "She did not compare Assange DIRECTLY to Polanski or call him 'Polanski like'.
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#66
Julian Assange is a Euro-trash asshole who's spent his entire adult life treating women like shit.
baldguy
Aug 2012
#3
On what factual basis do you claim that "Julian Assange is a Euro-trash asshole who's spent his
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#28
The same basis that people have to convict him solely on the stength of the accusation.
baldguy
Aug 2012
#52
The massing of the British police was just part of the reminder and not part of a threat?
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#69
UK protected war criminal Pinochet but Assange isn't charged with any crime
WillYourVoteBCounted
Aug 2012
#5
Pinochet used legal maneuvers to delay his extradition until his defense team...
randome
Aug 2012
#6
It's still bullshit. They knew it was the one accusation that could turn Progressives against him.
Comrade_McKenzie
Aug 2012
#11
True, there's no proof. I'm not even sure that it is a "he said/she said" or a police-say thing.
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#65
It could be that in cases involving sex, direct transcripts are routinely withheld...
randome
Aug 2012
#67
That can't be the case because they already released some direct transcripts in this case.
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#80
The one thing that is NOT speculation is that the U.K. appeals process validated everything.
randome
Aug 2012
#84
"why would they not already have extradited Assange"? Maybe he went to the Ecuadorian embassy.
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#90
Not only true, but the he's-a-rapist-advocates don't even know if there was a broken condom.
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#34
Why can't he be both, you ask? Asking that we accept (1) that which is fact based and (2) that
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#21
This is where there is no black and white. Apparently there was consensual sex here both
Cleita
Aug 2012
#88
Nobody? I'm not sure that there is universal agreement, without proof, that he behaved "like
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#54
Your bilateral thinking is shown by your original post and your present claim that I fall within
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#77
Exactly. It's a tactic as old as Rome. Manipulate public opinion against someone
Cleita
Aug 2012
#91
Like Good JFK and Bad JFK. Or good/bad Woodrow Wilson. OR good/bad Napoleon Bonaparte.
Bucky
Aug 2012
#51