Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
28. On what factual basis do you claim that "Julian Assange is a Euro-trash asshole who's spent his
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 01:08 PM
Aug 2012
entire adult life treating women like shit"?

Is there a factual basis for this?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good Julian vs Bad Julian [View all] renie408 Aug 2012 OP
Of course he can, and you see a fair number of people like me cali Aug 2012 #1
Assange has no problem being sent off to Sweden to face trial... AntiFascist Aug 2012 #94
no kidding. that's why I'm against his being extradited to Sweden. cali Aug 2012 #96
Because... AntiFascist Aug 2012 #97
Sure. You can be like Roman Polanski: make brilliant movies and Chorophyll Aug 2012 #2
That's what I was thinking. renie408 Aug 2012 #9
I don't doubt that governments (mainly ours) would love to get their hands on him. Chorophyll Aug 2012 #20
If ad hominem arguments can be used to convict anybody, then we should all agree that he is guilty. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #26
Then he needs to face the music in Sweden, regardless of how we characterize his behavior. randome Aug 2012 #29
I believe I said that Polanski was an extreme example. Chorophyll Aug 2012 #33
It is an extreme example. But an extreme example of what? He's not Polanski and he is not AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #42
I was responding to the OP and that was an example that came to mind. Chorophyll Aug 2012 #47
Thank you for your request. Please let me assure you that I am not "attempting to read" your mind. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #63
You keep using that word.... renie408 Aug 2012 #64
I agree with you that "She did not compare Assange DIRECTLY to Polanski or call him 'Polanski like'. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #66
Julian Assange is a Euro-trash asshole who's spent his entire adult life treating women like shit. baldguy Aug 2012 #3
Politicians are embarrassed every day. randome Aug 2012 #4
Bingo. 99Forever Aug 2012 #7
On what factual basis do you claim that "Julian Assange is a Euro-trash asshole who's spent his AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #28
The same basis that people have to convict him solely on the stength of the accusation. baldguy Aug 2012 #52
The U.K. made an ill-advised reminder of diplomatic versus political asylum. randome Aug 2012 #60
The massing of the British police was just part of the reminder and not part of a threat? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #69
It was a piss-poor reaction to events. No doubt about it. randome Aug 2012 #74
They retroactively repudiated their threat? backscatter712 Aug 2012 #82
They apologized, according to Ecuador. randome Aug 2012 #87
The UK certainly owed Equador an apology. n/t backscatter712 Aug 2012 #99
They don't need to do all that treestar Aug 2012 #40
What do you call threatening to invade the embassy? baldguy Aug 2012 #55
They are not invading the embassy treestar Aug 2012 #72
That's not what they said last week. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #86
UK protected war criminal Pinochet but Assange isn't charged with any crime WillYourVoteBCounted Aug 2012 #5
Pinochet used legal maneuvers to delay his extradition until his defense team... randome Aug 2012 #6
Pinochet was also personal friends with high officials in the UK and US govts. baldguy Aug 2012 #14
His legal team still used the appeals process to delay and obstruct. randome Aug 2012 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #8
That is pretty much what I just posted upthread. renie408 Aug 2012 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten Aug 2012 #16
It's still bullshit. They knew it was the one accusation that could turn Progressives against him. Comrade_McKenzie Aug 2012 #11
I am curious renie408 Aug 2012 #12
Like Scott Ritter, maybe? randome Aug 2012 #13
Worked once... baldguy Aug 2012 #15
Yeah, pretty much. renie408 Aug 2012 #18
You do realize that "the things they say he did" amount to a broken condom, Lionessa Aug 2012 #19
Right. It's a minor thing, not a honey trap at all. randome Aug 2012 #22
He was neutralized anyway when Amazon, etc. dropped him treestar Aug 2012 #39
If AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #46
Of course there is no proof. It's a he said/she said thing. randome Aug 2012 #49
True, there's no proof. I'm not even sure that it is a "he said/she said" or a police-say thing. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #65
It could be that in cases involving sex, direct transcripts are routinely withheld... randome Aug 2012 #67
That can't be the case because they already released some direct transcripts in this case. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #80
The one thing that is NOT speculation is that the U.K. appeals process validated everything. randome Aug 2012 #84
"why would they not already have extradited Assange"? Maybe he went to the Ecuadorian embassy. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #90
Another thing I am curious about... renie408 Aug 2012 #32
Not only true, but the he's-a-rapist-advocates don't even know if there was a broken condom. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #34
False. Robb Aug 2012 #61
I bet you're amazed at how many times these facts have to be posted... SidDithers Aug 2012 #100
At this point, I have ceased commenting about Assange MineralMan Aug 2012 #17
Why can't he be both, you ask? Asking that we accept (1) that which is fact based and (2) that AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #21
Because the rape allegations don't seem as concrete as they should, Cleita Aug 2012 #23
Ok, THANKS... renie408 Aug 2012 #36
Nobody's saying Assange didn't behave like a douche. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #43
Then what he committed needs a name, because he committed something. renie408 Aug 2012 #50
This is where there is no black and white. Apparently there was consensual sex here both Cleita Aug 2012 #88
Nobody? I'm not sure that there is universal agreement, without proof, that he behaved "like AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #54
See, you are kind of what I am talking about with Camp Good Julian. n/t renie408 Aug 2012 #57
Your bilateral thinking is shown by your original post and your present claim that I fall within AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #77
I don't care if you buy or not. renie408 Aug 2012 #85
The lynching vigilantes are doing exactly what our CIA wants them to do, Cleita Aug 2012 #89
While I love a geek named Bob Aug 2012 #101
Then the propaganda is working - the government wants us polarized. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #25
"Low-level sexual misbehavior." Robb Aug 2012 #27
Not 'legitimate' sexual misbehavior. randome Aug 2012 #30
Yep. Not the kind that the woman's body can "shut down." Chorophyll Aug 2012 #38
There's the false equivalence again. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #45
The only way he should be treated is according to Swedish laws. randome Aug 2012 #48
Again, you're assuming that Sweden's behaving honestly in this case. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #71
There is no 'evidence' one way or the other to think he is being singled out. randome Aug 2012 #73
Are the women themselves calling it rape? No. backscatter712 Aug 2012 #37
"Acting in a manner designed to violate her sexual integrity." Robb Aug 2012 #53
To me it would be better to say, "Yeah, he's a creep.... renie408 Aug 2012 #41
Exactly. It's a tactic as old as Rome. Manipulate public opinion against someone Cleita Aug 2012 #91
The "good" he did is questionable treestar Aug 2012 #31
Ineffective? So, things went according to plan. Excellent! Pholus Aug 2012 #35
Your post doesn't make sense. treestar Aug 2012 #44
scratches head nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #58
Yes, but do they 'dislike' having their dirty linen in the open... randome Aug 2012 #62
There were 4 major leakages treestar Aug 2012 #75
It embarrassed MULTIPLE governments nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #83
But they are not doing anything about it treestar Aug 2012 #93
That is not the point. nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #95
Then you didn't think about it long enough. Pholus Aug 2012 #78
Like Good JFK and Bad JFK. Or good/bad Woodrow Wilson. OR good/bad Napoleon Bonaparte. Bucky Aug 2012 #51
I have always thought that the kind of ego that would make you renie408 Aug 2012 #56
So did the Founding Fathers Bucky Aug 2012 #59
Even Gandhi wasn't a complete saint. leveymg Aug 2012 #68
I think you have raised a very interesting point. People are complex. nt msanthrope Aug 2012 #70
And complex people exceedingly so. I wouldn't want the world led by saints and simpletons. leveymg Aug 2012 #76
Well said. AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #92
It's all in the name. randome Aug 2012 #79
I'm sure he is both a brilliant man and an asshole LadyHawkAZ Aug 2012 #81
when he let go of 250k cable with absolutely no check in place for innocent lives, i turned on him seabeyond Aug 2012 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Good Julian vs Bad Julian»Reply #28