Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rachel pointed out the meaning to Chairman Nadler's methodologically extending deadlines. [View all]Ninga
(8,275 posts)18. I understand where you are coming from. This
is why I appreciate the deliberation the Dems must
constantly be conducting.
Right now they have determined the courts to be their most important audience.
It matters not how right they are,they know they must satisfy the judicial process.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Rachel pointed out the meaning to Chairman Nadler's methodologically extending deadlines. [View all]
Ninga
May 2019
OP
You may be right. The Dotard's escalating arrogant criminal behaviors will not stop.
Ninga
May 2019
#4
I think they are waiting for Mueller's testimony, which they expect within the next couple weeks. nt
pnwmom
May 2019
#20
I do agree with this approach. It's very important to follow procedure. However, if it gets caught
UniteFightBack
May 2019
#2
It's going to be in the court system for lengthy periods of time regardless.
TwilightZone
May 2019
#5
What other Watergate-related rulings did the Supreme Court make before impeachment
onenote
May 2019
#36
The point of my post was that people expect it to take 2 years for the courts to rule on Congress'
onenote
May 2019
#38
The possibility that a court might respond positively to a request to expedite a ruling
StarfishSaver
May 2019
#39
Nadler and Pelosi know their shit. I'm glad neither one has aspirations to higher office
ehrnst
May 2019
#9
...and while we're giving them every chance, the clock keeps ticking which is in their favor.
Nevermypresident
May 2019
#16
Can you explain what "judicial process" you are referring to? My understanding is our
Nevermypresident
May 2019
#21
Example: Nadler files contempt charges for not turning over etc. Judge sez, Nadler you know only
Ninga
May 2019
#25
Thank you. My exception is "two hours" vs. the actual reality of what has transpired so far,i.e.
Nevermypresident
May 2019
#31
The longer the 'methodology' takes, the less likely RBG will be there to rule on it n/t
Ponietz
May 2019
#22
Good catch! Why don't I just go ahead and add Democrats writ large to Congressional Dems
Ninga
May 2019
#28
8 dimensional intergalactic chess. I'm so sick of decades of intergalactic chess.
MadDAsHell
May 2019
#40