Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bank fraud, insurance fraud, tax fraud.... C_U_L8R May 2019 #1
ALL of the above and MORE bluestarone May 2019 #2
Statutes of limitations are a problem - can't use these old bank records The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #4
Which i see as the BIGGEST reason bluestarone May 2019 #7
Why can't the IRS charge him or refer the potential crimes to the DOJ rusty fender May 2019 #11
EXACTLY my point! bluestarone May 2019 #12
Yes! And why didn't the IRS and the DOJ do rusty fender May 2019 #13
YES i mentioned THIS also! bluestarone May 2019 #17
Tax records by themselves usually don't reveal crimes unless there's an audit. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #14
Chump's current tax filings haven't been released FakeNoose May 2019 #19
Right, but the IRS has them rusty fender May 2019 #20
When DeutscheBank releases their documents FakeNoose May 2019 #21
If the returns by themselves didn't contain evidence of anything illegal, The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #27
K&R. NT at140 May 2019 #23
Who will prosecute? What happens when, NOT IF, he REFUSES to leave the WH? Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #26
There could be evidence of bank fraud, tax evasion and money laundering. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #3
Hate statute of limitations bullshit bluestarone May 2019 #5
No, there are good reasons for statutes of limitations and they were not a GOP idea. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #6
True BUT in some cases this is NOT the problem. bluestarone May 2019 #8
That would violate the law and no prosecutor would do it. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #15
There's more! Locutusofborg May 2019 #34
Statutes of limitation have existed for hundreds of years onenote May 2019 #9
Maybe time to change it then? bluestarone May 2019 #10
Be careful what you wish for. Statutes of limitations have always existed The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #16
I DO see your point BUT bluestarone May 2019 #18
It's weird to see DUers make arguments that law and order types made in the past onenote May 2019 #31
Put that way bluestarone May 2019 #32
So how come the IRS never went after him? HipChick May 2019 #22
You or i would be in jail bluestarone May 2019 #24
Because taking large losses or declaring a lot of interest isn't illegal. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2019 #25
Gotta wonder tho that if they see NOW what he was up to in the past bluestarone May 2019 #30
The irs tax transcript probably came from a lender file Cicada May 2019 #28
Tax Fraud fwvinson May 2019 #29
The Statute of Limitations has Likely Run dlk May 2019 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe someone can help me...»Reply #7