Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
21. I don't have much patience for the "Leaders must inspire us if they want us to vote" argument
Thu May 9, 2019, 02:35 PM
May 2019

Maybe people should stop waiting to be "inspired" by strangers and go out and make change themselves
I came of voting age in the 1980s and the last thing I was looking for or expecting was to be "inspired" by politicians. In fact, I thought that was no longer possible, that that sort of feeling had died with Bobby Kennedy. But that didn't stop me from getting involved, trying to make a difference in my community, and working as hard as I could to try to elect people whom I thought would be best for us, even if they didn't send a tingle up or down my leg.

When Bill Clinton came along, he DID inspire me and I saw that as a wonderful, unexpected bonus. It was thrilling to feel that way and I have often since felt that way with other politicians, such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Paul Wellstone, John Edwards, and plenty of others at the national, state and local levels, etc. But I still see that as a "nice to have" not a "must have." I believe that it's my responsibility to work for change - and that includes being directly engaged in the political process and voting like my life depends on it in every election - regardless whether the people running or in office give me warm fuzzy feelings. And I truly believe that if inspiration must be had, it's on ME to be that inspiration.

I really wish people were less concerned about being inspired - and stopped threatening to or actually sit it out unless and until someone tickles their fancies - and actually put their shoulders to the wheel to work for change and be inspirations themselves.

Hey, y'all. It's not about you. It's about we. And we need all of you to get engaged and VOTE and we don't care whether you want to invite the candidate to your next cookout.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1287&pid=94566



If the consequences of not voting aren't enough to "inspire" them, nothing a politician says is going to do it.

And it's not like it was a big secret that if the Senate and White House went Republican, we'd get a lot of Republican judges appointed for life. People just didn't care or were trying to make some other point so that's on them.

People need to take some responsibility for their lives and stop expecting to be given tingles up their legs before they'll vote.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Trump had nothing to do with it dhol82 May 2019 #1
You are correct. The Rethuglican* High Command realized YEARS AGO that their brand was... Raster May 2019 #5
Trump had everything to do with it StarfishSaver May 2019 #14
She might have done better nominating but Mitch et al would have blocked everything dhol82 May 2019 #24
He couldn't have blocked everything 64, no matter how hard he tried StarfishSaver May 2019 #25
From an ideological perspective an empty judgeship is better than one filled with a far right winger LonePirate May 2019 #31
'Thanks' elleng May 2019 #30
Which is why I say a hearty "Fuck You"... 3catwoman3 May 2019 #2
Unless the economy is tanking like in 2008, the courts are always the #1 reason to vote blue. LonePirate May 2019 #33
Damn right! 3catwoman3 May 2019 #46
I don't think anybody can accuse the GOP leadership of being stupid anarch May 2019 #3
agreed, but NewJeffCT May 2019 #7
Amen to this 1,000 times! moose65 May 2019 #11
I don't put the blame solely on Democratic leadership StarfishSaver May 2019 #15
Not soley, no NewJeffCT May 2019 #17
I don't have much patience for the "Leaders must inspire us if they want us to vote" argument StarfishSaver May 2019 #21
You may not like it, but it's a fact of life in the modern era NewJeffCT May 2019 #22
You're talking about "charsima" of presidential candidates StarfishSaver May 2019 #23
Repub turnout in 2014 was nothing special. Dem turnout fell off a cliff in 2014 which was disastrous LonePirate May 2019 #34
Yawn...I have no idea why you're going on about abqtommy May 2019 #4
The Con's supporters are not smarter than Democrats malaise May 2019 #6
The voters don't have a clue. It's the Republican think tanks that sinkingfeeling May 2019 #8
Exactly. SammyWinstonJack May 2019 #9
His voters have nothing to do with the courts...that's the tried and true trump fuck. spanone May 2019 #10
Wrong. The evangelicals have been obsessed with the courts. It's their prime motivator. LonePirate May 2019 #35
Bless your heart Rambling Man May 2019 #12
Wrong, democratic voters never lost sight of the courts Fresh_Start May 2019 #13
exactly and those types don't really care for many liberal issues JI7 May 2019 #20
Yes, and PRINCIPLED courts were already manifestations Hortensis May 2019 #29
To put the number in perspective onenote May 2019 #16
Senior status judges still hear and decide cases StarfishSaver May 2019 #26
some do. And a lot more of the ones appointed by Clinton are still hearing cases onenote May 2019 #38
Of course more Clinton judges are serving the Reagan judges StarfishSaver May 2019 #42
but the media is too busy reporting on this clowns every tweet IcyPeas May 2019 #18
True StarfishSaver May 2019 #19
not like many of us didn't warn DU about consequences in 2016 beachbum bob May 2019 #27
Guess how many times Barack Obama mentioned Merrick Garland at the 2016 convention BeyondGeography May 2019 #28
You're right. If only that Obama had mentioned Garland in his speech StarfishSaver May 2019 #36
Keep blaming the voters and letting leaders off the hook BeyondGeography May 2019 #37
I will indeed blame voters for the leaders they put in or allow to be put in StarfishSaver May 2019 #40
Racists voted for a racist. this post gives trump voters credit for something that isn't true. so Kurt V. May 2019 #32
Obama warned us Blue_Tires May 2019 #39
"She didn't make me feel better about myself, so she didn't deserve my vote" StarfishSaver May 2019 #41
Hillary recieved THREE MILLION more votes than Trump. John Fante May 2019 #43
Yes, she did. But, obviously, that wasn't enough to keep Trump judges off the courts StarfishSaver May 2019 #44
This maladministration is shredding the rule of law Brawndo May 2019 #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump voters may be ignor...»Reply #21