General Discussion

Nuggets

(525 posts)

57. Instant gratification?

Sun May 19, 2019, 01:23 PM

May 2019

The FBI has known about this since 2015!
And there actions throughout this entire investigation have been questionable.

The first quiet warning of the Russian operation came in September 2015, when an agent from the FBI's Washington Field Office notified the Democratic National Committee that Russian hackers had compromised at least one DNC computer. It was the FBI's first direct contact with the DNC: a message left for a low-level computer technician, who did not return the FBI's call.
"They left a phone message at the help desk of the DNC," Podesta said. "They didn't treat it with the kind of seriousness, I think, that it deserved."

It’s not that complicated. Plus our FBI has already helped a rapist get seated in the SCOTUS with their
“investigation” of Kavanaugh.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

109 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mueller burned us [View all] boston bean May 2019 OP

He needs to decide where his loyalty belongs - with a corrupt DOJ or the nation, as a whole Siwsan May 2019 #1

It is also the drips coming out that weren't in the report that is also causing me suspicion. boston bean May 2019 #2

Which particular drips? Nuggets May 2019 #47

He might be waiting for 2020 election... Joe941 May 2019 #4

Or he might be waiting to stick it to Dems Nuggets May 2019 #46

That is more likely exboyfil May 2019 #56

Yes, Why is Flynn off the hook? Nuggets May 2019 #61

Or might be waiting for 2020 election...so they can say any testimony would cause lunasun May 2019 #101

I see we've moved from last week's Pelosi bashing to several OPs going after Mueller today EffieBlack May 2019 #3

What does that mean? I am some Russian trump bot? boston bean May 2019 #5

It means what I said in plain English EffieBlack May 2019 #8

"Methinks" is plain English? boston bean May 2019 #10

It was plain enough for you to understand it. EffieBlack May 2019 #11

Perhaps you don't. boston bean May 2019 #12

It means exactly what I thought it meant Nictuku May 2019 #23

Can you also google "Englidh"? boston bean May 2019 #25

That was clearly a typo but you knew that. tymorial May 2019 #58

When that's all you've got Jakes Progress May 2019 #98

Why would I? Nictuku May 2019 #27

I guess if one is going to say someone must not understand plain English they may type boston bean May 2019 #33

Your OP may have had a point, but Jakes Progress May 2019 #99

That's your conclusion after reading the sub thread? boston bean May 2019 #100

Yep. And now your argument is down to emojis. Jakes Progress May 2019 #103

You are funny! boston bean May 2019 #104

So, what do you mean funny? Jakes Progress May 2019 #106

LOL boston bean May 2019 #108

Post removed Post removed May 2019 #14

"pelosi bashing? " you think that is a good way to phrase that? irisblue May 2019 #24

You'll have to ask effieblack it's their term Fullduplexxx May 2019 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author irisblue May 2019 #30

It was a set up. Gotta watch out for that. KPN May 2019 #34

Someone set him/her up by getting them to say they were bashing Pelosi? EffieBlack May 2019 #82

Lol, paranoid much? Nt USALiberal May 2019 #19

Nope. Just perceptive. EffieBlack May 2019 #21

yup. Perceptive. Never wavering support for Mueller. Just like Comey and Rosenstein? LiberalLovinLug May 2019 #88

Right. Nuggets May 2019 #107

There are very good reasons not to trust Mueller. Nuggets May 2019 #48

I have faith in Mueller, watoos May 2019 #6

The summaries were released. boston bean May 2019 #7

Mueller's executive summaries were never released, watoos May 2019 #36

Yes they were released. boston bean May 2019 #59

People need to stop jumping to conclusions based on incomplete information EffieBlack May 2019 #13

+1. MLAA May 2019 #32

Jumping to a conclusion about BostonBean's intent is okay, though? Grasswire2 May 2019 #43

Apparently so. Nuggets May 2019 #50

Lol, like you jumped to yours?? Classic! Nt USALiberal May 2019 #60

I don't think his actions were unprincipled, but I agree that he burned us. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #9

I guess our society has conditioned us to expect instant gratification in all things. CaptainTruth May 2019 #15

Thank you for the truth-telling EffieBlack May 2019 #20

Contradicting the redacted report, watoos May 2019 #37

"the fault of House Democrats that we don't have Mueller's full report." StarfishSaver May 2019 #42

Open an impeachment hearing watoos May 2019 #54

Sounds good. But StarfishSaver May 2019 #63

Instant gratification? Nuggets May 2019 #57

If I got a voicemail saying it was the FBI, I would tend to not believe it. LisaM May 2019 #93

Did you see his "snitty" letter to Barr or the letter signed by hundreds of former prosecutors who Glimmer of Hope May 2019 #16

Did you actually read the prosecutors' letter? StarfishSaver May 2019 #22

He strikes me as a bookworm Beringia May 2019 #17

Yeah, a decorated Vietnam war veteran book worm. watoos May 2019 #38

Well I don't think he has ever spoken out against the Vietnam war Beringia May 2019 #62

He's a non-partisan, and he gave the evidence for prosecution to the body the Constitution pnwmom May 2019 #39

You have no idea if he's non partisan. Nuggets May 2019 #51

Don't think so stopdiggin May 2019 #67

He was following the law that required him to submit a report to the AG pnwmom May 2019 #78

The law required Barr to hand over the full report NewJeffCT May 2019 #89

then what about Mueller stopdiggin May 2019 #90

Yes I'm sure he does NewJeffCT May 2019 #92

He has one unique opportunity to take down Trump. Funtatlaguy May 2019 #18

He can also leak the full report FakeNoose May 2019 #109

I still believe Mueller is doing his duty for the country. Quackers May 2019 #26

Some people are upset that Democratic leaders don't behave like a left wing version of Trump EffieBlack May 2019 #29

Right. They don't understand or believe in the concept of non-partisanship, pnwmom May 2019 #40

Did you read the Mueller report? GemDigger May 2019 #31

I doubt that most of the people who are criticizing in - on the right and left - have even read it StarfishSaver May 2019 #35

If your neighbor tells you he is moving away in a week, watoos May 2019 #41

And when the cops come and arrest him without doing any investigation StarfishSaver May 2019 #45

I'm not sure you understand that we're in an emergency right now Blues Heron May 2019 #55

"Emergencies" aren't justification for ignoring the law. StarfishSaver May 2019 #65

THIS TommyCelt May 2019 #85

Mueller hasn't burned us yet. He may still come forward and fix his mistake. shockey80 May 2019 #44

HE DIDN'T !! stopdiggin May 2019 #70

I'm beginning to think that House Democrats don't really want him to testify madville May 2019 #49

Mueller has been consistently been well thought out and way ahead of the empedocles May 2019 #52

He has other investigations going. Neoma May 2019 #53

it's not Mueller that is the problem JI7 May 2019 #64

Christ on a Trailer Hitch, people. How many of you have READ THE REPORT? Start THERE. Hekate May 2019 #66

Oh,excuse me. Has he testified and I didn't see it. boston bean May 2019 #68

LOL SunSeeker May 2019 #97

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU! StarfishSaver May 2019 #69

Free &/or cheap! Read it here! Accept no substitutes! Hekate May 2019 #71

I've read the report JustAnotherGen May 2019 #72

He did was he was supposed to....however, others are not and he should of seen that coming a mile UniteFightBack May 2019 #73

If the Mueller Report is good enough for Justin Amash (R-MI) Locutusofborg May 2019 #74

Yes Blues Heron May 2019 #75

Yep. StarfishSaver May 2019 #77

Reminder: Jeff Flake (AZ) "spoke up." They ended his career. Honeycombe8 May 2019 #84

Mueller still has to prosecute Roger Stone Locutusofborg May 2019 #76

Mueller is not concerned about the Stone prosecution. former9thward May 2019 #79

Has Mueller discussed his personal opinions and priorities with you? StarfishSaver May 2019 #80

Who said he was worried? Locutusofborg May 2019 #81

Asinine nonsense FrankBooth May 2019 #83

He did. And yet we're still waiting for Mueller to testify, ecstatic May 2019 #86

Sewing the seeds of doubt.... the_sly_pig May 2019 #87

I say, Old Bean, you seem to underestimate the work Mueller did and the evidence he gave us. Nitram May 2019 #91

Post removed Post removed May 2019 #94

Representative Salud Carbajal (D-CA) Locutusofborg May 2019 #95

I agree, boston bean. SunSeeker May 2019 #96

He has been a disappointment for sure... BlueJac May 2019 #102

My guess is that he has a big money gig lined up Bettie May 2019 #105