Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Scared' students are rejecting colleges in states with strict abortion laws [View all]
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Statements/2019/ACOG-Statement-on-Abortion-Bans
ACOG Statement on Abortion Bans
May 9, 2019
Washington, D.C. Ted Anderson, M.D., Ph.D., president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), issued the following statement in response to the many restrictions being placed on abortion access across the country:
"ACOG strongly opposes political efforts to limit a womans ability to get the care she needs, including bans on abortion care. ACOG recognizes that abortion is an essential component of health care for millions of women and opposes political interference in health care. As the nations leading group of physicians providing health care for women, ACOG is dedicated to evidence-based and compassionate care.
Across the country, legislation is advancing restrictions that would impose professional, civil, and even criminal penalties on physicians for providing safe, high-quality abortion care to their patients. These restrictions range from total bans to bans at arbitrary gestational ages, bans on the safest method of abortion after 12 weeks, bans based on a womans reason for seeking care, bans on medically-induced abortion via telemedicine, bans on physicians ability to exercise their best medical judgment according to their medical training, limits on which clinicians can provide abortion care, and more. Any of these restrictions would make safe and timely abortion care increasingly unavailable, which increases womens health risks.
"Lawmakers must support health policies based on sound science and evidence. Politicians must seek to improve access to care, not restrict it. Legislative restrictions fundamentally interfere with the patientprovider relationship and decrease access to necessary care for all women, and particularly for low-income women and those living long distances from health care providers. Health care decisions should be made jointly only by patients and their trusted health care professionals, not by politicians.
###
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) is the nations leading group of physicians providing health care for women. As a private, voluntary, nonprofit membership organization of more than 58,000 members, ACOG strongly advocates for quality health care for women, maintains the highest standards of clinical practice and continuing education of its members, promotes patient education, and increases awareness among its members and the public of the changing issues facing womens health care. www.acog.org
https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2019/Amicus-Brief-in-June-Medical-Services-LLC-v-Gee
The brief argues that precedent dictates that laws regulating abortion should be supported by a valid medical justification and that the Supreme Courts decision in Whole Womans Health v. Hellerstedt, which struck down a substantially similar law in Texas, should be applied to Louisiana Act 620.
By requiring that a physician providing abortions have admitting privileges at a hospital that is located not further than 30 miles from the clinic at which the physician provides abortions, Louisiana Act 620 is nearly identical to the stricken Texas law. There is nothing unique to Louisiana that makes such a regulation necessary for the well-being of women, the brief argues: Legal abortions performed in Louisiana prior to the passage of Act 620 were already safe and rarely required hospital admission; admitting privileges are unnecessary for safe patient care and can be difficult or impossible to obtain for reasons unrelated to a clinicians competence; and imposing these unjustified burdens on abortion providers impedes womens access to quality, evidence-based medicine.
https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Statements/2019/ACOG-Statement-on-Abortion-Bans
ACOG Statement on Abortion Bans
May 9, 2019
Washington, D.C. Ted Anderson, M.D., Ph.D., president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), issued the following statement in response to the many restrictions being placed on abortion access across the country:
"ACOG strongly opposes political efforts to limit a womans ability to get the care she needs, including bans on abortion care. ACOG recognizes that abortion is an essential component of health care for millions of women and opposes political interference in health care. As the nations leading group of physicians providing health care for women, ACOG is dedicated to evidence-based and compassionate care.
Across the country, legislation is advancing restrictions that would impose professional, civil, and even criminal penalties on physicians for providing safe, high-quality abortion care to their patients. These restrictions range from total bans to bans at arbitrary gestational ages, bans on the safest method of abortion after 12 weeks, bans based on a womans reason for seeking care, bans on medically-induced abortion via telemedicine, bans on physicians ability to exercise their best medical judgment according to their medical training, limits on which clinicians can provide abortion care, and more. Any of these restrictions would make safe and timely abortion care increasingly unavailable, which increases womens health risks.
"Lawmakers must support health policies based on sound science and evidence. Politicians must seek to improve access to care, not restrict it. Legislative restrictions fundamentally interfere with the patientprovider relationship and decrease access to necessary care for all women, and particularly for low-income women and those living long distances from health care providers. Health care decisions should be made jointly only by patients and their trusted health care professionals, not by politicians.
###
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) is the nations leading group of physicians providing health care for women. As a private, voluntary, nonprofit membership organization of more than 58,000 members, ACOG strongly advocates for quality health care for women, maintains the highest standards of clinical practice and continuing education of its members, promotes patient education, and increases awareness among its members and the public of the changing issues facing womens health care. www.acog.org
https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2019/Amicus-Brief-in-June-Medical-Services-LLC-v-Gee
The brief argues that precedent dictates that laws regulating abortion should be supported by a valid medical justification and that the Supreme Courts decision in Whole Womans Health v. Hellerstedt, which struck down a substantially similar law in Texas, should be applied to Louisiana Act 620.
By requiring that a physician providing abortions have admitting privileges at a hospital that is located not further than 30 miles from the clinic at which the physician provides abortions, Louisiana Act 620 is nearly identical to the stricken Texas law. There is nothing unique to Louisiana that makes such a regulation necessary for the well-being of women, the brief argues: Legal abortions performed in Louisiana prior to the passage of Act 620 were already safe and rarely required hospital admission; admitting privileges are unnecessary for safe patient care and can be difficult or impossible to obtain for reasons unrelated to a clinicians competence; and imposing these unjustified burdens on abortion providers impedes womens access to quality, evidence-based medicine.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Scared' students are rejecting colleges in states with strict abortion laws [View all]
riversedge
May 2019
OP
not all doctors are smart. I once got yelled at by a doctor who read in my records
demigoddess
May 2019
#30
Have these legislators actually thought about the fallout from these bills?
smirkymonkey
May 2019
#3
They should also consider blow-back from women who die from forced childbirth.
KY_EnviroGuy
May 2019
#11
Not to worry. It will create a vacuum for places like Liberty University to fill
ProudLib72
May 2019
#7
They're probably the same states with lax rape and sexual assault laws too.
TheBlackAdder
May 2019
#14
And movie and TV productions are pulling out of Georgia as to not put the women who work for them...
Politicub
May 2019
#17
Lol at the mom who nixed her daughter's dream school and then said she wanted to control her
WhiskeyGrinder
May 2019
#18
