Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

volstork

(5,786 posts)
4. From ACOG
Sun May 26, 2019, 10:03 AM
May 2019
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists


https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/Statements/2019/ACOG-Statement-on-Abortion-Bans

ACOG Statement on Abortion Bans

May 9, 2019

Washington, D.C. — Ted Anderson, M.D., Ph.D., president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), issued the following statement in response to the many restrictions being placed on abortion access across the country:

"ACOG strongly opposes political efforts to limit a woman’s ability to get the care she needs, including bans on abortion care. ACOG recognizes that abortion is an essential component of health care for millions of women and opposes political interference in health care. As the nation’s leading group of physicians providing health care for women, ACOG is dedicated to evidence-based and compassionate care.

“Across the country, legislation is advancing restrictions that would impose professional, civil, and even criminal penalties on physicians for providing safe, high-quality abortion care to their patients. These restrictions range from total bans to bans at arbitrary gestational ages, bans on the safest method of abortion after 12 weeks, bans based on a woman’s reason for seeking care, bans on medically-induced abortion via telemedicine, bans on physicians’ ability to exercise their best medical judgment according to their medical training, limits on which clinicians can provide abortion care, and more. Any of these restrictions would make safe and timely abortion care increasingly unavailable, which increases women’s health risks.

"Lawmakers must support health policies based on sound science and evidence. Politicians must seek to improve access to care, not restrict it. Legislative restrictions fundamentally interfere with the patient–provider relationship and decrease access to necessary care for all women, and particularly for low-income women and those living long distances from health care providers. Health care decisions should be made jointly only by patients and their trusted health care professionals, not by politicians.”

###

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) is the nation’s leading group of physicians providing health care for women. As a private, voluntary, nonprofit membership organization of more than 58,000 members, ACOG strongly advocates for quality health care for women, maintains the highest standards of clinical practice and continuing education of its members, promotes patient education, and increases awareness among its members and the public of the changing issues facing women’s health care. www.acog.org



https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2019/Amicus-Brief-in-June-Medical-Services-LLC-v-Gee


The brief argues that precedent dictates that laws regulating abortion should be supported by a valid medical justification and that the Supreme Court’s decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, which struck down a substantially similar law in Texas, should be applied to Louisiana Act 620.

By requiring that a physician providing abortions have admitting privileges at a hospital that is located not further than 30 miles from the clinic at which the physician provides abortions, Louisiana Act 620 is nearly identical to the stricken Texas law. There is nothing unique to Louisiana that makes such a regulation necessary for the well-being of women, the brief argues: “Legal abortions performed in Louisiana prior to the passage of Act 620 were already safe and rarely required hospital admission; admitting privileges are unnecessary for safe patient care and can be difficult or impossible to obtain for reasons unrelated to a clinician’s competence; and imposing these unjustified burdens on abortion providers impedes women’s access to quality, evidence-based medicine.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Colleges may or may not take notice of female students or female athletes FM123 May 2019 #1
Time for us men to step up. Girard442 May 2019 #8
A few might take notice. There are Ilsa May 2019 #27
I have been curious why more doctors are not speaking up. Akacia May 2019 #2
From ACOG volstork May 2019 #4
This should be an OP malaise May 2019 #5
Finally, they stepped up. This needs Ilsa May 2019 #28
Respectfully, volstork May 2019 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author Ilsa May 2019 #42
not all doctors are smart. I once got yelled at by a doctor who read in my records demigoddess May 2019 #30
I don't dispute that. volstork May 2019 #34
Not too bright and highly offensive. WTF kind of doctor is THAT? NT UniteFightBack May 2019 #43
thank you, I was wondering what they thought. nt. Akacia May 2019 #35
Have these legislators actually thought about the fallout from these bills? smirkymonkey May 2019 #3
They should also consider blow-back from women who die from forced childbirth. KY_EnviroGuy May 2019 #11
Yes, exactly. Especially forcing young girls to give birth. smirkymonkey May 2019 #21
That could return to being a rampant problem in high poverty areas..... KY_EnviroGuy May 2019 #33
Alabama is often used as a great example of an affordable college for STEM kids MissB May 2019 #6
Not to worry. It will create a vacuum for places like Liberty University to fill ProudLib72 May 2019 #7
You may be right. I'd love to see the repuglicon playbook. erronis May 2019 #13
It many not be as intentional as I made it sound, but they can turn it into ProudLib72 May 2019 #16
As they should! RT Atlanta May 2019 #9
Can we ban religions on medical grounds? safeinOhio May 2019 #10
More likely that they will ban medicine on religious grounds. erronis May 2019 #15
Made me think we need safeinOhio May 2019 #22
all these misogynist states should be boycotted nt yaesu May 2019 #12
The misogyny springs directly from their Christian beliefs. stopbush May 2019 #19
They're probably the same states with lax rape and sexual assault laws too. TheBlackAdder May 2019 #14
And movie and TV productions are pulling out of Georgia as to not put the women who work for them... Politicub May 2019 #17
Lol at the mom who nixed her daughter's dream school and then said she wanted to control her WhiskeyGrinder May 2019 #18
I would likely do the same. Ilsa May 2019 #31
Yeah, if her dream school is Oberlin, that's not exactly backwards. WhiskeyGrinder May 2019 #36
Even Girl's Schools? OxQQme May 2019 #20
No big loss. Aristus May 2019 #23
There's some great universities in the Deep South. Turin_C3PO May 2019 #25
Duke, Rice, Vanderbilt, Tulane, UoV, Washington, Emory and the list goes on. FreeBe May 2019 #38
Yeah, I know. Crazy, isn't it? Aristus May 2019 #39
Lots of reason, lol. I get that. FreeBe May 2019 #40
Washington University in St Louis Mo is an high ranked school. Especially the law University. FreeBe May 2019 #37
This is good. PatrickforO May 2019 #24
Good! Turin_C3PO May 2019 #26
I think a lot of males will reconsider going as well. Iliyah May 2019 #29
I bet they didn't think about that. GETPLANING May 2019 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Scared' students are rej...»Reply #4