Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so" [View all]Hoyt
(54,770 posts)74. None of the revelations before the election -- he's a buffoon, racist, liar, cad, etc. -- or after
Last edited Wed May 29, 2019, 05:49 PM - Edit history (1)
the election have "dragged trump down," and the polls show the American electorate is pretty much against Impeachment after we watched trump obstruct numerous times, call on Russians for help, read Mueller's report and even Barr summary saying they cannot "exonerate" trump, etc.
I appreciate your optimism, but there is a reason Democrats have not started formal Impeachment, and one of them is Pelosi and other leaders know the votes aren't there.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so" [View all]
Recursion
May 2019
OP
That's ultimately up to a jury, but anyone else would have at least been indicted.
tinrobot
May 2019
#35
Yes, that is it...What was said above.."...the president probably did a crime." Mueller's intent.
Stuart G
May 2019
#31
In other words, nothing new. We have already known that was his belief, what I wasn't sure is how
yaesu
May 2019
#15
I agree...I suspect that there "wasn't enough evidence" is what Mueller is saying.
Stuart G
May 2019
#27
OK...I agree with you..There was sufficient evidence for a crime! Rules prohibited charging Trump.
Stuart G
May 2019
#36
Report said same thing and even Barr's summary stated same. Unfortunately, still no Impeachment.
Hoyt
May 2019
#54
Gave it over 2 months -- Barr's letter 3/24/19, and Redacted Report April 17, 2019 said same thing.
Hoyt
May 2019
#67
None of the revelations before the election -- he's a buffoon, racist, liar, cad, etc. -- or after
Hoyt
May 2019
#74
I've been watching MSNBC and all of the "experts" are acting like Mueller said something new today.
Hoyt
May 2019
#70
The dotard is still screaming that he was exonerated none the less.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
May 2019
#68
Someone with knowledge please explain how a Senate trial will take place...we already know
SayItLoud
May 2019
#78
That was the line that struck me the most. In other words, "he committed a crime."
George II
May 2019
#79
The House Impeachment inquiry doesn't have to lead to a Senate Trial to be effective
neohippie
May 2019
#87