General Discussion

pnwmom

(110,219 posts)

29. I'm not sure about that. Amy Berman Jackson saw the full unredacted report, but I haven't heard

Reply to DeminPennswoods (Reply #25)

Fri May 31, 2019, 06:27 PM

May 2019

that about Sullivan.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Barr is apparently withholding transcripts of Flynn calls with Kislyak from judge who ordered them [View all] pnwmom May 2019 OP

Don't know whether it's Barr or not... FBaggins May 2019 #1

This will be interesting n/t malaise May 2019 #2

Betting Judge Sullivan ain't gonna be amused about not getting Kislyak call transcript MFGsunny May 2019 #3

One would hope. We haven't had a lot of hope lately. OnDoutside May 2019 #7

GMTA! StarfishSaver May 2019 #48

Barr and Trump folie a deux. tymorial May 2019 #4

Don't wait for the Senate repukes. wasupaloopa May 2019 #13

Will only delay the inevitable disclosure GitRDun May 2019 #5

Someone needs to put Barr in his place. Glimmer of Hope May 2019 #6

SmugThug Big Fat Bottom Barr's place is in a cell! abqtommy May 2019 #8

Isn't this contempt of court? Clarity2 May 2019 #9

A question, what can the judge do about it? davekriss May 2019 #11

It's direct contempt. TruckFump May 2019 #18

But who would enforce contempt for the judge? davekriss May 2019 #24

The US Marshalls will arrest him DeminPennswoods May 2019 #32

The US Marshalls fall under the executive branch davekriss May 2019 #60

US MARSHALLS TruckFump May 2019 #38

Thing is, though, the US Marshals Service is a part of the executive branch Tarc May 2019 #42

An order from a judge is an order from a judge. TruckFump May 2019 #44

The Marshals are part of the executive branch, but they report to the judges and are very loyal StarfishSaver May 2019 #49

The DOJ would have to find a more powerful judge to issue a stay to the Marshal's with TeamPooka May 2019 #55

They may try to appeal the contempt order to an appellate court StarfishSaver May 2019 #56

as I said, finding the legal basis for such an action is the challenge to the DOJ there TeamPooka May 2019 #57

They're definitely not up to the job. But that won't stop them from trying ... StarfishSaver May 2019 #58

I would be astounded if the US Marshall Service did not arrest Barr if the Judge ordered it. TomSlick May 2019 #51

Isn't Barr somewhere outside Washington? ancianita May 2019 #26

Does not matter if a person is presently before the court. TruckFump May 2019 #39

And they'll get away with it keith sw May 2019 #10

What are you saying the Dems can do to make Barr turn over the recordings? wasupaloopa May 2019 #14

So if the Dems can't do anything keith sw May 2019 #34

There will be new legislation if we get control of government wasupaloopa May 2019 #59

Yeah "obviously" it's all the Dems fault FrankBooth May 2019 #16

Yeah keith sw May 2019 #33

I thought this was a site for a Democratic "underground"... DemocracyMouse May 2019 #40

Not one word of your post was truth FrankBooth May 2019 #43

So now they're going against the courts too ... Some bastards uponit7771 May 2019 #12

Ditto. Just disgusting. Crime team trump just pissing all over our institutions/laws. iluvtennis May 2019 #30

I wish someone would arrest Barr. Ilsa May 2019 #15

I do too! bluestarone May 2019 #41

Next Up, a Show Cause/Contempt Hearing dlk May 2019 #17

Yes, indeed DeminPennswoods May 2019 #22

Does FOIA apply here? FakeNoose May 2019 #50

If the DOJ Refuses to Release in Response to a Court Order dlk May 2019 #52

Just another step to stone wall the people! BlueJac May 2019 #19

Had a feeling this would happen. Hope the judge is not as 'patient' as the democrats in congress. triron May 2019 #20

FTR, Sullivan was the judge who ordered the DHS plane DeminPennswoods May 2019 #21

If Sullivan can't get it, it really doesn't augur well for the rest. OnDoutside May 2019 #23

"If Sullivan can't get it, it really doesn't augur well for the rest." LenaBaby61 May 2019 #27

Sullivan has already seen the all the evidence DeminPennswoods May 2019 #25

I'm not sure about that. Amy Berman Jackson saw the full unredacted report, but I haven't heard pnwmom May 2019 #29

Sullivan should have all the relevent documents DeminPennswoods May 2019 #31

He should but I don't think he does. The (former) Mueller team is arguing that the documents pnwmom May 2019 #35

Perhaps the state where he passed the Bar should consider disbarring Barr as a first step still_one May 2019 #28

There you go! Ligyron May 2019 #36

Yes, and I guess none of that appears likely. I don't even know if Congress has the authority to still_one May 2019 #37

Ditto for Don McGann. nt TrollBuster9090 May 2019 #46

Sullivan should ISSUE A BENCH WARRENT for that ugly toad's ARREST! TrollBuster9090 May 2019 #45

I cannot WAIT to see Judge Sullivan's reaction to this StarfishSaver May 2019 #47

I know! Maddow thinks he'll respond quickly. Too bad this had to happen on a Friday. pnwmom May 2019 #54

Makes me want to know what Trump and Putin talk about 1-on-1, too. Kid Berwyn May 2019 #53

WaPo's Devlin Barrett was on with Maddow DeminPennswoods Jun 2019 #61