Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT - Goldberg "Democratic Voters Want Impeachment. The House Dawdles." [View all]NRaleighLiberal
(61,864 posts)4. Well...I for one completely agree with her. Is our powder dry enough?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT - Goldberg "Democratic Voters Want Impeachment. The House Dawdles." [View all]
NRaleighLiberal
Jun 2019
OP
Thank you... been sayin this for awhile now. Just impeach that POS already!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2019
#2
Sadly not enough people. Impeachment is under water. Even then, it ends with
redstateblues
Jun 2019
#5
The goal of impeachment is impeachment . The senate can refuse to do it's job
Fullduplexxx
Jun 2019
#9
Actually, the point of impeachment is to remove an unfit president from office
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#40
Perhaps you should read the actual report and not the Trump/Barr abridged edition
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#15
I suggest you read or reread it. 21 times Mueller said they "did not identify evidence" of
Hoyt
Jun 2019
#21
The report DIDN'T say they didn't identify evidence of collusion, conspiracy, cooperation with
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#45
Looks pretty clear to me what they said. Mueller knew what he was doing giving trump cover.
Hoyt
Jun 2019
#47
"Looks pretty clear" that nowhere in the report did Mueller say what you claimed
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#48
Your own post includes a whole lot of We "did not identify evidence." Sorry, you can't accept it.
Hoyt
Jun 2019
#50
And your post repeatedly misstates what Mueller report he "did not identify evidence" of
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#51
Look, would love for trump to be impeached for being a racist if nothing else. But Muel' wimped out.
Hoyt
Jun 2019
#52
But she does think she's more in touch with the Democratic Party and ordinary people than the
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#56
Yeah that's all I hear people talking about is impeaching rump...NOT. nt
UniteFightBack
Jun 2019
#18
Considering he is the most dangerous and incompetent president in my lifetime, the fact
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#19
Sad but true. And an exonerated dotard could not be charged later for his crimes
Thekaspervote
Jun 2019
#27
This is not accurate. Impeachment vs. state criminal/civil charges are 2 different things.
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#35
it is within the structure of a republic to become a plutocracy. That's what we're seeing here.
Kurt V.
Jun 2019
#28
You do realize that "if the Speaker assigns the House Judiciary Committee to
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#36
Pazzyanne - I was addressing your comment "haste makes waste" by pointing out the
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#38
Sure - but I still don't see how this relates to your "haste makes waste" post which I
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#42
I thought this was a serious discussion, not a "game". You have a great day as well.
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#59