Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: (WAPO) Laurence Tribe: Impeach Trump. But don't necessarily try him in the Senate. [View all]UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)6. I think that eventually impeachment will occur after Dem's get those financial documents. Fall is
better timing anyway. Let rump twist in the wind for the summer. Let the drumbeat continue. SLOW FUCKING BURN.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
(WAPO) Laurence Tribe: Impeach Trump. But don't necessarily try him in the Senate. [View all]
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
OP
The House could find guilt or censure, Senate referral if removal is sought
bigbrother05
Jun 2019
#1
Wow. Laurence Tribe, he is really something! He has definitely given us food for thought....
FM123
Jun 2019
#2
Really? You say that? While the House is led by the UNPRECEDENTED Nancy Pelosi, first woman?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2019
#16
Unprecedented proceedings. Has nothing to do with the genitals of any House member.
Nevilledog
Jun 2019
#17
I think that eventually impeachment will occur after Dem's get those financial documents. Fall is
UniteFightBack
Jun 2019
#6
Sounds like a good strategy. I suspect Nancy Pelosi is edging towards this decision.
Princetonian
Jun 2019
#13
I thought this was the plan all along as there was no way the fascists would ever help. nt
yaesu
Jun 2019
#24
Walter Dellinger & Claire McCaskell discussing Tribe's piece with Chris Hayes (MSNBC) now
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#36
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Read the actual piece. This might well be the approach that could break through
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#38
If I'm reading this correctly, a House verdict is "for show," it has no actual legal consequence.
CaptainTruth
Jun 2019
#40