Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: (WAPO) Laurence Tribe: Impeach Trump. But don't necessarily try him in the Senate. [View all]barbtries
(29,735 posts)35. no shit.
the evil bastard.
yesterday i think it was, Adam Schiff said he considered Barr the 2nd most dangerous man in the country. I think he's in 3rd place, and McConnell is number 1.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
(WAPO) Laurence Tribe: Impeach Trump. But don't necessarily try him in the Senate. [View all]
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
OP
The House could find guilt or censure, Senate referral if removal is sought
bigbrother05
Jun 2019
#1
Wow. Laurence Tribe, he is really something! He has definitely given us food for thought....
FM123
Jun 2019
#2
Really? You say that? While the House is led by the UNPRECEDENTED Nancy Pelosi, first woman?
Bernardo de La Paz
Jun 2019
#16
Unprecedented proceedings. Has nothing to do with the genitals of any House member.
Nevilledog
Jun 2019
#17
I think that eventually impeachment will occur after Dem's get those financial documents. Fall is
UniteFightBack
Jun 2019
#6
Sounds like a good strategy. I suspect Nancy Pelosi is edging towards this decision.
Princetonian
Jun 2019
#13
I thought this was the plan all along as there was no way the fascists would ever help. nt
yaesu
Jun 2019
#24
Walter Dellinger & Claire McCaskell discussing Tribe's piece with Chris Hayes (MSNBC) now
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#36
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Read the actual piece. This might well be the approach that could break through
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#38
If I'm reading this correctly, a House verdict is "for show," it has no actual legal consequence.
CaptainTruth
Jun 2019
#40