Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I was politically active, aware, and THERE for Watergate... [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(128,778 posts)26. Exactly right. That there were many "honorable" GOPers at that time is a myth,
as this NYT op-ed also explains:
In early 1973 Senate Democrats led the charge to form a special committee to focus on Watergate. While the Senate Watergate Committee was being created, Republican Senator Edward Gurney of Florida belittled the investigation as one of those political wing-dings that happen every political year. Ted Stevens, a Republican senator from Alaska, repeated Mr. Fords warning that the investigation could become a political witch hunt, according to Mr. Kutler.
Meanwhile, the ranking Republican on the Senate Watergate Committee, Howard Baker of Tennessee a man often lauded for putting principle over party met with Mr. Nixon to discuss strategy. To maintain his purity in the Senate, Mr. Baker didnt want anyone to know about meeting Mr. Nixon, wrote the White House counsel, John Dean, in a memo before a meeting with Mr. Nixon. Once the hearings started in late spring of 1973, Mr. Bakers staff leaked information about the committees witnesses and plans to Mr. Nixon.
When Mr. Baker famously asked, What did the president know, and when did he know it? during the Watergate hearings, he meant to protect Mr. Nixon in the mistaken belief that the president didnt know about the Watergate cover-up until many months after it occurred. The question backfired once evidence mounted that Mr. Nixon was involved in the cover-up from the start, and Mr. Baker eventually became a critic of the president...
Most congressional Republicans rallied around Mr. Nixon when the White House released edited transcripts of those tapes in April 1974 that showed Mr. Nixon scheming with his aides. As the House Judiciary Committee began debating possible impeachment in July, Representative Delbert Latta of Ohio said the evidence failed to prove Mr. Nixons direct involvement in Watergate.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/13/opinion/watergate-republican-party.html
Meanwhile, the ranking Republican on the Senate Watergate Committee, Howard Baker of Tennessee a man often lauded for putting principle over party met with Mr. Nixon to discuss strategy. To maintain his purity in the Senate, Mr. Baker didnt want anyone to know about meeting Mr. Nixon, wrote the White House counsel, John Dean, in a memo before a meeting with Mr. Nixon. Once the hearings started in late spring of 1973, Mr. Bakers staff leaked information about the committees witnesses and plans to Mr. Nixon.
When Mr. Baker famously asked, What did the president know, and when did he know it? during the Watergate hearings, he meant to protect Mr. Nixon in the mistaken belief that the president didnt know about the Watergate cover-up until many months after it occurred. The question backfired once evidence mounted that Mr. Nixon was involved in the cover-up from the start, and Mr. Baker eventually became a critic of the president...
Most congressional Republicans rallied around Mr. Nixon when the White House released edited transcripts of those tapes in April 1974 that showed Mr. Nixon scheming with his aides. As the House Judiciary Committee began debating possible impeachment in July, Representative Delbert Latta of Ohio said the evidence failed to prove Mr. Nixons direct involvement in Watergate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And each of them - Nixon, Reagan, W, & Trump, were elected by committing profound crimes against us.
NBachers
Jun 2019
#6
Exactly. Which is why I keep saying Trump is not an "anomaly". He is simply a Republican.
Midnight Writer
Jun 2019
#39
It is a testament to how far Republicans have fallen that by comparison they look heroic then.
hlthe2b
Jun 2019
#7
I was around but young, so didn't recall that. Thanks. But Carter wasn't torpedoed.
Honeycombe8
Jun 2019
#12
The torpedo was when Iran was told to hang on to the captives. Ronnie will give you a better deal.
3Hotdogs
Jun 2019
#35
Exactly right. That there were many "honorable" GOPers at that time is a myth,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2019
#26
the difference is talk radio, and that's also why we've regressed the last 30 years
certainot
Jun 2019
#36