Is this the photo that could clear Assange ?

[sabrina 1]

74. Thanks for proving my point. If 'she said it' it must be true even if she changes the story

multiple times, produces a condom, torn, but with no DNA on it, jokes about 'making money by destroying him' and gives instructions publicly on how to get 'revenge' on a man. And even if their own lawyer says 'this case is weak'.

But if he said it never happened, even if it didn't, he must be lying.

And of course that's why, in the CIA memo published on Wikileaks, the CIA settled on a 'sex scandal' in order to destroy Wikileaks. They are so effective if you want to destroy someone. Or used to be.

The problem is this time, people actually want to see proof.

Sometimes I wonder about people who jump to conclusions as soon as a woman makes an allegation like this, it almost seems as if they want the woman to have been raped.

I would prefer, for the woman's sake, that she is lying about it. Because rape is such a violent, brutal, mentally destructive, vicious and hateful crime, that I truly hope it never happens to anyone, even if they are saying it did. Better to be caught lying about such a horrific crime than for it to actually have happened.