Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(19,214 posts)

3. good luck proving it.

Wed Jun 12, 2019, 05:28 PM

Jun 2019

The other issue for employers is workman's comp. The policies usually have a clause that requires employees to abstain from recreational drugs.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nevada bans employers from refusing to hire applicants who test positive for pot [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2019 OP

Excellent!!! Some progress out of the woods! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2019 #1

Did a stint of a few months as Wellstone ruled Jun 2019 #2

good luck proving it. Mosby Jun 2019 #3

I think that's an easier barrier than it appears fescuerescue Jun 2019 #4

Makes sense they had to exempt any employee that drives a vehicle madville Jun 2019 #5

I sure wish CA does the same. maveric Jun 2019 #6