Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

madville

(7,834 posts)

5. Makes sense they had to exempt any employee that drives a vehicle

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Wed Jun 12, 2019, 06:18 PM

Jun 2019

Insurance companies aren't going to allow any employee driving under their policy to test positive for an intoxicating drug, their civil liability would be huge and insurance rates for businesses in that state would go through the roof.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nevada bans employers from refusing to hire applicants who test positive for pot [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2019 OP

Excellent!!! Some progress out of the woods! n/t RKP5637 Jun 2019 #1

Did a stint of a few months as Wellstone ruled Jun 2019 #2

good luck proving it. Mosby Jun 2019 #3

I think that's an easier barrier than it appears fescuerescue Jun 2019 #4

Makes sense they had to exempt any employee that drives a vehicle madville Jun 2019 #5

I sure wish CA does the same. maveric Jun 2019 #6

You can be puking drunk on the streets Saturday night, but they'll still hire you Monday. hunter Jun 2019 #7

It's amazing, isn't it. Booze is pretty much edible poison, but yet pot is seen as some RKP5637 Jun 2019 #8