Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Amazon Fires Back at AOC: She's 'Just Wrong' to Say We Pay 'Starvation Wages' [View all]Leith
(7,864 posts)17. It's easy enough to look this up on Glassdoor
I just did. Many of the lowest wages are $13 ~ $14 per hour, but they could be older reports. They do have full benefits that start on day 1.
The lower paying jobs are strenuous (somebody has to run around the warehouse putting an order together) and it won't be easy living in a large urban area on that wage, but Amazon pays more than your local bank teller or barista.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
123 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Amazon Fires Back at AOC: She's 'Just Wrong' to Say We Pay 'Starvation Wages' [View all]
DonViejo
Jun 2019
OP
Yeah! It is not starvation wages, it is "decide whether to pay rent or starve" wages.
Thomas Hurt
Jun 2019
#1
A minimum wage law is not a duty or an impost or an excise, those are all taxes...
Thomas Hurt
Jun 2019
#65
you left out the actual clause containing the enumerated power, number 3, in Sec. 8
Celerity
Jun 2019
#77
Don't blame Amazon only...Walmart, among other companies are this same way, ...
SWBTATTReg
Jun 2019
#4
The key is average. A $3 million per year executive and a lot of people paid much less.
Blue_true
Jun 2019
#42
It was only 25,000 (the other 25K were to be in Virginia) and only half were in tech. It also
Celerity
Jun 2019
#48
You know that democrats don't leave people to burn, even when people are stupid.
Blue_true
Jun 2019
#123
Yes, $15/hr ($30K/yr) is dirt wages. $7.25/hr min wage is subterranean wages.
LonePirate
Jun 2019
#28
How come you have not been posting against the people calling for $15 a hour?
former9thward
Jun 2019
#30
$15 per hour for a childless, single person where I live is a pretty good wage.
Blue_true
Jun 2019
#43
And stock prices are impacted by business costs (including labor costs) which impact profitability.
LonePirate
Jun 2019
#110
She does not know. None of the people mouthing the $15 per hour standard know.
Blue_true
Jun 2019
#47
Yeah, and who let on that they plan to automate that facility in 2 years, after getting tax breaks?
TheBlackAdder
Jun 2019
#10
I would assume those who don't agree with Amazon's wage structure do not do business with them
still_one
Jun 2019
#11
If you are a single parent, 15 USD an hour, pre-tax, in NYC, is a joke AND, as Amazon's
Celerity
Jun 2019
#19
Yes, and not working for Amazon because because they "don't pay enough" is about Amazon
Alea
Jun 2019
#26
If you want to defend them paying less than half of the US average for similar work, knock
Celerity
Jun 2019
#29
How does making the MW a decent level (enough to support a family) allow single people to price
Celerity
Jun 2019
#88
that is a huge leap, and I would love to see some datasets to back that up now
Celerity
Jun 2019
#90
Then we need to stop with the outrage about employees being on public assistance
Recursion
Jun 2019
#112
revise it again to show that Amazon is going to pay less than HALF of the national average for that
Celerity
Jun 2019
#38
How many people who criticize Amazon are willing to stop ordering their inexpensive goods
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#57
I didn't mention "working class people." Why would you suggest I'm "blaming" them
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#68
Do you seriously think the reason they don't make people full time is lack of business?
melman
Jun 2019
#86
you mean that wages would rise automatically, independently of market forces.
kennetha
Jun 2019
#105