Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(19,863 posts)

4. My understanding is that the case was dismissed for a lack of standing.

Mon Jun 17, 2019, 10:18 PM

Jun 2019

Not a ruling on substance, so it shouldn’t impact the other cases.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This ruling should effect the gerrymander case in NC blm Jun 2019 #1

Is the NC case over state or congressional districts? RandySF Jun 2019 #2

The decision was not about gerrymandering. COLGATE4 Jun 2019 #11

Damn blm Jun 2019 #14

Brilliant news! Cha Jun 2019 #5

Wait a second. sheshe2 Jun 2019 #6

Holy Stinky The Clown Jun 2019 #7

Shit Stinky The Clown Jun 2019 #8

! ! ! Stinky The Clown Jun 2019 #9

Again, as the above posters noted, the ruling was only on standing pecosbob Jun 2019 #12

Right, not a precedent. grantcart Jun 2019 #13

I hope this is a harbinger of things to come in Ohio Norbert Jun 2019 #15