Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LiberalLovinLug

(14,620 posts)
8. Bingo!
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 03:44 AM
Jun 2019

She's in the minority, but a very powerful minority in the party. Who have some unbeknownst interest in not wanting to upset the applecart. I'm sure she wants to beat Trump as much as anyone, she just is more comfortable not gambling with an impeachment. Even if its the right thing to do in any historical definition you could make. If she / we did start it up, even if we lost in the Senate...even if we lost in 2020 Although I think that highly unlikely after all the dirt comes out. Ten years later and onwards I think historians and writers could take a breath and look back at the Trump era with the horror it deserves. I think we are all still in an ongoing state of shock.

If the Senate protects him from impeachment, Democrats and young people will vote. If we vote en mass, we win. IMO its a much greater gamble NOT to impeach. Because if you then still lose in 2020, it would be near impossible to then start impeachment. And Democrats would be branded cowards, by probably Trump himself, with derisive tweets. I don't know if I could stand that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Speaker Pelosi doesn't...»Reply #8