Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The one question for which I really need an answer [View all]malaise
(294,342 posts)14. Precisely
So someone does decide and for millions of pot users who were sent to prison while some of these charlatans have DUIs
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We need more regulation of media. Scientific journals have peer review. We need something
diva77
Jun 2019
#15
we're already suffering the dire effects of unregulated "news" - I don't think things should
diva77
Jun 2019
#26
At least when the Fairness Doctrine was in effect, you didn't have Rush Limbaugh and his
diva77
Jun 2019
#30
I'd pretend what you responded to and your reponse are relevant to each other too.
LanternWaste
Jun 2019
#34
Used to be that Americans had honor and morality and would never had elected some thing like that
demtenjeep
Jun 2019
#19
I share your concern. In any decent system such charlatans would be disqualified.
BSdetect
Jun 2019
#8
In any country of decent people, such charlatans wouldn't stand a chance of being elected anyway
FiveGoodMen
Jun 2019
#37
