Water is not wet ....says US Supreme Court.

[matmar]

5. Because of this paragraph...

But by "dress up its value judgment ... as a factual statement," continued Hasen, the U.S. Supreme Court must now explain why the Montana Supreme Court was not correct to consider the factual record when it came to justifying corporate spending limits in campaign finance laws.

.....the reason for the laws that were enacted to prevent corporate money from corrupting our government was because of the historical record of corporate money corrupting our government.

Go fugure.