Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PDJane

(10,103 posts)
16. I don't know about you, but I would consider a child to be anything under 19 or so.
Tue Aug 28, 2012, 07:56 PM
Aug 2012

And no, the age itself doesn't really matter. However, a 14 year old is a child emotionally, in spite of brilliance. My son read "The Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire" during his summer break the year he turned 10. No matter how intelligent he was and is, no matter his grasp of speculative physics or computer theory, his grasp of the difference between reality and fantasy was tenuous at best, and his view of morality was absolute.

Jailing, for instance, a 15-year-old shot in the back in Afghanistan, leaving him to be tortured, and then claiming his guilt of a crime he had his back to at the time is outrageous (Ohmr Kadr).

The life sentence should not be handed out by rote, and the death penalty is a barbaric leftover. The way we treat prisoners, of whatever age and condition, is disgusting, and it's not the way to rehabilitate people or even care for their physical needs. Long sentences are a waste of time for both the watcher and the watched.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There are teens and children who are psychotic and violent, who present a real risk to the public slackmaster Aug 2012 #1
I don't agree with charging a minor as an adult. PDJane Aug 2012 #2
"as a rule" jberryhill Aug 2012 #3
Would you think it better to flip the whole thing upside down? Stinky The Clown Aug 2012 #4
Well, some adults are just big kids. deaniac21 Aug 2012 #6
No, it's simply a matter of shifting presumptions jberryhill Aug 2012 #13
There is no reason to charge a child or an imbecile as if they are a fully functioning adult. PDJane Aug 2012 #5
Define "child" jberryhill Aug 2012 #12
I don't know about you, but I would consider a child to be anything under 19 or so. PDJane Aug 2012 #16
I agree that intellectual capacity has nothing to do with it jberryhill Aug 2012 #17
Some cannot be rehabilitated and are too dangerous to be in society REP Aug 2012 #19
Using absolute timeframes doesn't work, though. randome Aug 2012 #21
Right jberryhill Aug 2012 #22
I am really ambivalent about this Mojorabbit Aug 2012 #28
He is 15, not 14. LisaL Aug 2012 #7
Who is "he"? Stinky The Clown Aug 2012 #8
The same one you declared to be a "victim" in your previous thread. LisaL Aug 2012 #9
You're quite amazing. You ought to charge admission as you read people's minds Stinky The Clown Aug 2012 #20
You mean, like Edmund Kemper? REP Aug 2012 #10
That may be a good example of how the system did not work in the past. randome Aug 2012 #11
Richard Grissom Jr REP Aug 2012 #14
Thanks for the information. I don't know if there is a solution that can satisfy both sides. randome Aug 2012 #18
Case-by-case evaluation of the crime and the defendant - not a blanket rule REP Aug 2012 #23
Some people cannot process beyond arbitrary lines jberryhill Aug 2012 #15
is this the kid who shot the Bully ? JI7 Aug 2012 #24
No, its hypothetical Stinky The Clown Aug 2012 #25
I like you Stinky pintobean Aug 2012 #27
He shot a kid with Down's Syndrome pintobean Aug 2012 #26
He didn't shoot the bully. LisaL Aug 2012 #29
The logic seems to be ManiacJoe Aug 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The 14 year old sho...»Reply #16