Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,790 posts)
35. A compromised Rump is allowing Russia to go wild with S-400 sales
Fri Jun 21, 2019, 08:04 PM
Jun 2019
U.S. redoubles sanctions threat over S-400 as Erdogan vows retaliation

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-usa-security-erdogan/us-redoubles-sanctions-threat-over-s-400-as-erdogan-vows-retaliation-idUSKCN1TL1F8

ISTANBUL/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The U.S. government on Thursday said economic sanctions over Turkey’s planned purchase of a Russian missile defense system remained a “very viable” option, even as Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan vowed to retaliate if that occurred.

U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs Clarke Cooper told reporters on a teleconference that the United States and other NATO allies remained in discussions with Turkey about resolving the dispute.

“Seeking resolution is still within the realm of possible today, but imposition of sanctions remains a course of action and a very viable one at this point,” Cooper said during a visit to Brussels, where NATO is headquartered.

In Istanbul, Erdogan, speaking at a rare news conference for foreign media, repeated that the purchase of Russian S-400 systems was a done deal and said the United States should think carefully before imposing sanctions on a NATO member.

“I do not see any possibility of these sanctions happening,” Erdogan said. However, if they did, “we will have sanctions of our own.”

Washington has repeatedly threatened to impose sanctions unless Ankara backs down from the S-400 purchase. Erdogan said the delivery of the system would start in the first half of July.

snip


US Warns India Over S-400 Air Defense System Deal With Russia
A senior U.S. diplomat warned India over procuring S-400 air defense systems from Russia in a recent congressional testimony.


https://thediplomat.com/2019/06/us-warns-india-over-s-400-air-defense-system-deal-with-russia/

A senior U.S. diplomat in a recent congressional testimony expressed deep concerns over India’s decision to procure five squadrons of Russian-made Almaz-Antei S-400 Triumf air defense systems (NATO reporting name: SA-21 Growler) for service in the Indian Air Force (IAF).

U.S. Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asia Alice Wells said in an official testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on June 13 that the purchase of the S-400 defense systems could limit burgeoning India-U.S. military relations.

The induction of the new long-range air defense systems “effectively could limit India’s ability to increase our own interoperability,” according to Wells, adding that the United States has “serious concerns” about the long-term strategic implications of the purchase for U.S.-India ties. “At a certain point, a strategic choice has to be made about partnerships and a strategic choice about what weapons systems and platforms a country is going to adopt,” Wells said.

India and Russia signed a $5 billion contract for the procurement of five S-400 squadrons during last year’s annual bilateral summit held in New Delhi in early October. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Russian President Vladimir Putin presided over the signing ceremony. The first S-400 squadron is expected to be stood up by the fall of 2020.

The Modi government has persisted in its decision to purchase the Russian-made S-400s despite strong opposition from the United States and the possible imposition of economic sanctions on India under U.S. legislation known as the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA). The legislation seeks to economically and financially punish countries engaging in “significant transactions”–defined as any deals above $15 million–with the Russian state-owned defense industry.

snip

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Surface to air missile... hlthe2b Jun 2019 #1
SAM atreides1 Jun 2019 #2
thank you... I just wanted it clarified. Acronyms like this are really not helpful. hlthe2b Jun 2019 #3
my bad, I thought it was common knowledge lanlady Jun 2019 #6
Whoop de doo, DoD maxsolomon Jun 2019 #4
"noone could have imagined that the terrorists would fly planes into buildings" Maine-i-acs Jun 2019 #8
Wasn't there a report just prior? Caliman73 Jun 2019 #15
August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing: bin Laden determined to strike inside the US Maine-i-acs Jun 2019 #25
Heck, there were novels and movies about that scenario. It was actually well anticipated. nt eppur_se_muova Jun 2019 #34
Despite the "training exercise" taking place that very morning for that exact scenario. trev Jun 2019 #17
Makes much more sense than trump suddenly feeling empathy. spanone Jun 2019 #5
IKR? shanny Jun 2019 #20
one suspects drones are not particularly fast compared to a missile so when a drone attacks Iran msongs Jun 2019 #7
The drone defense used to be altitude Brother Buzz Jun 2019 #21
Makes me nostalgic for the SR-71 days Liberal In Texas Jun 2019 #38
LA control can I get a speed check....... Hotler Jun 2019 #47
Is that the missile Ollie north gave Iran? Achilleaze Jun 2019 #9
Bingo! nt Ilsa Jun 2019 #13
Wouldn't doubt it. trev Jun 2019 #18
Your friends in the Pentagon sarisataka Jun 2019 #10
thanks, I will pass that on lanlady Jun 2019 #11
Sounds about right. Iran had been a Middle East leader in education and innovation... TreasonousBastard Jun 2019 #12
Our military seems obsessed with electronic countermeasures TheRealNorth Jun 2019 #14
It was a Raad SAM - Home grown jpak Jun 2019 #16
Drones aren't particularly stealthy, maneuverable, or equipped with countermeasures jberryhill Jun 2019 #19
Good discussion here: Red Mountain Jun 2019 #22
The thoughts we dare not speak. sarabelle Jun 2019 #23
If we did not know that... Tipperary Jun 2019 #24
Also, Putin called.... Nevermypresident Jun 2019 #26
+1, uponit7771 Jun 2019 #44
Imagine if they had the S-400 system. Xolodno Jun 2019 #27
A compromised Rump is allowing Russia to go wild with S-400 sales Celerity Jun 2019 #35
Except for Iran. Xolodno Jun 2019 #37
"no one thought the Iranians had the capability..." CloudWatcher Jun 2019 #28
I am not sure why your friends thought that... EX500rider Jun 2019 #29
"It is not a small UAV: " mitch96 Jun 2019 #32
That seems extremely unlikely. Codeine Jun 2019 #30
Iran also has the Mach 10 anti-ship missile Vegas Roller Jun 2019 #31
What missile would that be? sarisataka Jun 2019 #33
It is a Chinese DF-21D nt Vegas Roller Jun 2019 #39
Iran does not have the DF 21 sarisataka Jun 2019 #41
Doesn't look like we know what they have if this article is even half true uponit7771 Jun 2019 #43
Some folks who work at the Pentagon sarisataka Jun 2019 #46
Oh please - no country - not Russia, not China, not India has a Mach 10 antiship missle jpak Jun 2019 #36
Google Chinese DF-21D Vegas Roller Jun 2019 #40
That's a ballistic missile - and people are skeptical about its performance. jpak Jun 2019 #45
700 billion defense budget and "we didn't know" ?!?!?! I'd be pissed !!!!! uponit7771 Jun 2019 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About that Iranian SAM th...»Reply #35