Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I'm heart sick over Speaker Pelosi's decision to not act. [View all]GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)156. When your first response is to attack my grammar,
The rest of your argument is diminished.
I made a response to your post with an argument that disagrees with your premise. So we disagree. I respect your position but think strategically it is a dead end. So I dont believe it is the right thing to to since it does not advance the interest of the Democratic Party. Hardly a dishonorable position. Just different from yours.
I am aware I used a vernacular in my response.
I would enjoy a discussion about how a failed impeachment helps the cause of the Democratic Party. Cause I dont see it.
If you want to start our conversation about picayune issues like my grammar we will go nowhere.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
She's counting on big money from the donor class to reelect and add dems to congress.
Kurt V.
Jun 2019
#1
Source was the wrong word. its an old friend from when we were doing political fundraising
Kurt V.
Jun 2019
#154
So how would your friend hear about these alleged "big donors" who "tied Pelosi's hands?"
ehrnst
Jun 2019
#161
Poorly worded on my part. by we, i mean society in general. the fundraisers, bundlers, industry
Kurt V.
Jun 2019
#162
"How dare Pelosi consider the politics of impeachment when 67 percent of people support it"
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#5
I'd bet Speaker Pelosi would love to have the kind of power you think she does
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#11
On the one hand you tell us, she has all the power and is playing the strategic game.
cwydro
Jun 2019
#30
You and your ally here continually say she is playing the long game, knows what she's doing,
cwydro
Jun 2019
#44
Pelosi will be "holding the will of the majority of the Democratic party hostage?"
ehrnst
Jun 2019
#166
She's exerted her power to undermine any Pro-Impeachment movement in the House. So,
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#40
"Undermine?" She knows better than either you or I about what needs to be in place
ehrnst
Jun 2019
#116
If you read the article link I posted, it clearly says many are afraid to call Pelosi out by name or
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#160
"It is a command that colleagues say is drawn from a deep well of respect for the political wisdom
ehrnst
Jun 2019
#165
If she were putting "political calculations first" wouldn't she be driving toward impeachment
StarfishSaver
Jun 2019
#132
Today, there was a list of pieces of legislation the Dem House has passed and the GOP (McConnell)
world wide wally
Jun 2019
#81
I really believe that. We did a poor job responding to Ruskies, Comey, trump lies, etc.
Hoyt
Jun 2019
#23
Yes, it's naive to put all our eggs in the basket re the2020 election because of the reason
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#46
I think you're right that Nance knows exactly what she's doing. If we put all our efforts into
napi21
Jun 2019
#33
Attempting to impeach trump just gives him ammo to say "they've been after me for 4 yrs"
oldsoftie
Jun 2019
#31
And if he isn't he'll say it was a witch hunt. Televised Inquiry, now. The moment is slipping away
Cetacea
Jun 2019
#34
We have to deal with the facts as they are even if we dont like them. Pelosi is doing that.
oldsoftie
Jun 2019
#71
Then its worthless. Sure, you taint him with "impeached". Didnt hurt Clinton.
oldsoftie
Jun 2019
#118
You explain the strategy behind not promoting house hearings as impeachment inquiry well.
emmaverybo
Jun 2019
#51
"There's going to come a day when we all have to answer for what we did in this moment," said Rep.
Nevermypresident
Jun 2019
#53
Madame Speaker doesn't seem to understand something very important to many of us.
Goodheart
Jun 2019
#56
It seems like a lot of folks think Pelosi can start an impeachment inquiry by herself.
CaptainTruth
Jun 2019
#68
So, impeach and hand control of the process to McConnell? How does that make it better?
tinrobot
Jun 2019
#72
It took me a while, but I've come around to the same conclusion myself.
Still In Wisconsin
Jun 2019
#144